Radeon RX 6300 vs 680M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon 680M with Radeon RX 6300, including specs and performance data.

Radeon 680M
2023
50 Watt
8.47

RX 6300 outperforms 680M by an impressive 68% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking506368
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency11.9031.16
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameRembrandt+Navi 24
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date3 January 2023 (2 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768768
Core clock speed2000 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed2200 MHz2040 MHz
Number of transistors13,100 million5,400 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt32 Watt
Texture fill rate105.697.92
Floating-point processing power3.379 TFLOPS3.133 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs4848
Ray Tracing Cores1212

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x4
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared32 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data64 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent2x HDMI 2.1
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.2
Vulkan1.31.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Radeon 680M 8.47
RX 6300 14.20
+67.7%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Radeon 680M 3334
RX 6300 5586
+67.5%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD37
−62.2%
60−65
+62.2%
1440p17
−58.8%
27−30
+58.8%
4K11
−63.6%
18−20
+63.6%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 47
−59.6%
75−80
+59.6%
Counter-Strike 2 28
−60.7%
45−50
+60.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 38
−57.9%
60−65
+57.9%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 37
−62.2%
60−65
+62.2%
Battlefield 5 35−40
−66.7%
60−65
+66.7%
Counter-Strike 2 23
−52.2%
35−40
+52.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 28
−60.7%
45−50
+60.7%
Far Cry 5 38
−57.9%
60−65
+57.9%
Fortnite 45−50
−63.3%
80−85
+63.3%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−66.7%
60−65
+66.7%
Forza Horizon 5 38
−57.9%
60−65
+57.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
−55.2%
45−50
+55.2%
Valorant 80−85
−58.5%
130−140
+58.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 20
−50%
30−33
+50%
Battlefield 5 35−40
−66.7%
60−65
+66.7%
Counter-Strike 2 21
−66.7%
35−40
+66.7%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 120−130
−65.4%
210−220
+65.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 21
−66.7%
35−40
+66.7%
Dota 2 71
−54.9%
110−120
+54.9%
Far Cry 5 35
−57.1%
55−60
+57.1%
Fortnite 45−50
−63.3%
80−85
+63.3%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−66.7%
60−65
+66.7%
Forza Horizon 5 20−22
−50%
30−33
+50%
Grand Theft Auto V 36
−66.7%
60−65
+66.7%
Metro Exodus 23
−52.2%
35−40
+52.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
−55.2%
45−50
+55.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40
−62.5%
65−70
+62.5%
Valorant 80−85
−58.5%
130−140
+58.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
−66.7%
60−65
+66.7%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−50%
24−27
+50%
Cyberpunk 2077 18
−66.7%
30−33
+66.7%
Dota 2 61
−63.9%
100−105
+63.9%
Far Cry 5 33
−66.7%
55−60
+66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−66.7%
60−65
+66.7%
Forza Horizon 5 26
−53.8%
40−45
+53.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
−55.2%
45−50
+55.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24
−66.7%
40−45
+66.7%
Valorant 146
−64.4%
240−250
+64.4%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 45−50
−63.3%
80−85
+63.3%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 60−65
−61.3%
100−105
+61.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 17
−58.8%
27−30
+58.8%
Metro Exodus 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
−66.7%
70−75
+66.7%
Valorant 90−95
−63%
150−160
+63%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
−66.7%
30−33
+66.7%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−63.6%
18−20
+63.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 10
−60%
16−18
+60%
Far Cry 5 21
−66.7%
35−40
+66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−57.9%
30−33
+57.9%
Forza Horizon 5 14−16
−50%
21−24
+50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 17
−58.8%
27−30
+58.8%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 16−18
−58.8%
27−30
+58.8%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
−57.9%
30−33
+57.9%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 13
−61.5%
21−24
+61.5%
Valorant 40−45
−66.7%
70−75
+66.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
−55.6%
14−16
+55.6%
Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Cyberpunk 2077 4
−50%
6−7
+50%
Dota 2 18
−66.7%
30−33
+66.7%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−61.5%
21−24
+61.5%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%

This is how Radeon 680M and RX 6300 compete in popular games:

  • RX 6300 is 62% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6300 is 59% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6300 is 64% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.47 14.20
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 32 Watt

RX 6300 has a 67.7% higher aggregate performance score, and 56.3% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 6300 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 680M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon 680M is a notebook card while Radeon RX 6300 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 680M
Radeon 680M
AMD Radeon RX 6300
Radeon RX 6300

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 999 votes

Rate Radeon 680M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 30 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 680M or Radeon RX 6300, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.