Radeon Graphics 128SP vs 660M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking552not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency15.30no data
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameRembrandt+Raphael
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date3 January 2023 (2 years ago)27 September 2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384128
Core clock speed1500 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed1900 MHz2200 MHz
Number of transistors13,100 million3,400 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate45.6017.60
Floating-point processing power1.459 TFLOPS0.5632 TFLOPS
ROPs168
TMUs248
Ray Tracing Cores62
L0 Cache96 KB32 KB
L1 Cache128 KB64 KB
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB
L3 Cache8 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x8
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentMotherboard Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.31.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 January 2023 27 September 2022
Chip lithography 6 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 15 Watt

Radeon 660M has an age advantage of 3 months.

Graphics 128SP, on the other hand, has a 20% more advanced lithography process, and 166.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 660M and Radeon Graphics 128SP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 660M is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Graphics 128SP is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 660M
Radeon 660M
AMD Radeon Graphics 128SP
Radeon Graphics 128SP

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 427 votes

Rate Radeon 660M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.8 4 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics 128SP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 660M or Radeon Graphics 128SP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.