Radeon RX 6600 LE vs 660M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon 660M with Radeon RX 6600 LE, including specs and performance data.

Radeon 660M
2023
40 Watt
6.88

RX 6600 LE outperforms 660M by a whopping 493% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking56199
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency11.8721.34
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameRembrandt+Navi 23
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date3 January 2023 (2 years ago)8 December 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3841792
Core clock speed1500 MHz1626 MHz
Boost clock speed1900 MHz2495 MHz
Number of transistors13,100 million11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt132 Watt
Texture fill rate45.60279.4
Floating-point processing power1.459 TFLOPS8.942 TFLOPS
ROPs1664
TMUs24112
Ray Tracing Cores628

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data190 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data224.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.1
Vulkan1.31.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Radeon 660M 6.88
RX 6600 LE 40.83
+493%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Radeon 660M 2647
RX 6600 LE 15700
+493%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD24
−483%
140−150
+483%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−467%
85−90
+467%
Cyberpunk 2077 24
−483%
140−150
+483%
Elden Ring 22
−491%
130−140
+491%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
−491%
130−140
+491%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−467%
85−90
+467%
Cyberpunk 2077 10
−450%
55−60
+450%
Forza Horizon 4 42
−471%
240−250
+471%
Metro Exodus 32
−463%
180−190
+463%
Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
−450%
110−120
+450%
Valorant 36
−483%
210−220
+483%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
−491%
130−140
+491%
Counter-Strike 2 11
−491%
65−70
+491%
Cyberpunk 2077 7
−471%
40−45
+471%
Dota 2 35
−471%
200−210
+471%
Elden Ring 22
−491%
130−140
+491%
Far Cry 5 29
−486%
170−180
+486%
Fortnite 40−45
−485%
240−250
+485%
Forza Horizon 4 33
−476%
190−200
+476%
Grand Theft Auto V 25
−460%
140−150
+460%
Metro Exodus 20
−450%
110−120
+450%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
−436%
300−310
+436%
Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
−450%
110−120
+450%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−471%
120−130
+471%
Valorant 19
−479%
110−120
+479%
World of Tanks 100−110
−461%
600−650
+461%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
−491%
130−140
+491%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−467%
85−90
+467%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−471%
80−85
+471%
Dota 2 48
−483%
280−290
+483%
Far Cry 5 30−35
−481%
180−190
+481%
Forza Horizon 4 28
−471%
160−170
+471%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
−436%
300−310
+436%
Valorant 21−24
−491%
130−140
+491%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 7−8
−471%
40−45
+471%
Elden Ring 9−10
−456%
50−55
+456%
Grand Theft Auto V 7−8
−471%
40−45
+471%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−479%
220−230
+479%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−440%
27−30
+440%
World of Tanks 50−55
−480%
290−300
+480%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−483%
70−75
+483%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−450%
55−60
+450%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−440%
27−30
+440%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−471%
80−85
+471%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−477%
75−80
+477%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−450%
55−60
+450%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−463%
45−50
+463%
Valorant 18−20
−456%
100−105
+456%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Dota 2 18−20
−456%
100−105
+456%
Elden Ring 4−5
−425%
21−24
+425%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−488%
100−105
+488%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22
−450%
110−120
+450%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−425%
21−24
+425%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−488%
100−105
+488%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
−483%
35−40
+483%
Counter-Strike 2 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Dota 2 18−20
−456%
100−105
+456%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−463%
45−50
+463%
Fortnite 6−7
−483%
35−40
+483%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−471%
40−45
+471%
Valorant 6−7
−483%
35−40
+483%

This is how Radeon 660M and RX 6600 LE compete in popular games:

  • RX 6600 LE is 483% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.88 40.83
Recency 3 January 2023 8 December 2023
Chip lithography 6 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 132 Watt

Radeon 660M has a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 230% lower power consumption.

RX 6600 LE, on the other hand, has a 493.5% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 11 months.

The Radeon RX 6600 LE is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 660M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon 660M is a notebook card while Radeon RX 6600 LE is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 660M
Radeon 660M
AMD Radeon RX 6600 LE
Radeon RX 6600 LE

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 336 votes

Rate Radeon 660M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 16 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6600 LE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.