Radeon RX 9060 XT 8 GB vs 630

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon 630 with Radeon RX 9060 XT 8 GB, including specs and performance data.

Radeon 630
2019
2 GB GDDR5, 50 Watt
3.75

RX 9060 XT 8 GB outperforms 630 by a whopping 1188% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking73773
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data96.04
Power efficiency5.7224.54
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)RDNA 4.0 (2025)
GPU code namePolaris 23Navi 44
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date13 May 2019 (6 years ago)4 June 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$299

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5122048
Core clock speed1082 MHz1700 MHz
Boost clock speed1218 MHz3130 MHz
Number of transistors2,200 million29,700 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate38.98400.6
Floating-point processing power1.247 TFLOPS25.64 TFLOPS
ROPs1664
TMUs32128
Ray Tracing Coresno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz2518 MHz
Memory bandwidth112.0 GB/s322.3 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1b, 2x DisplayPort 2.1a
HDMI++

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Radeon 630 3.75
RX 9060 XT 8 GB 48.30
+1188%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Radeon 630 1572
RX 9060 XT 8 GB 20242
+1188%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−1167%
190−200
+1167%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−1150%
100−105
+1150%
God of War 9−10
−1122%
110−120
+1122%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
−1167%
190−200
+1167%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−1167%
190−200
+1167%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−1150%
100−105
+1150%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−1173%
140−150
+1173%
Fortnite 21−24
−1173%
280−290
+1173%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−1178%
230−240
+1178%
Forza Horizon 5 9−10
−1122%
110−120
+1122%
God of War 9−10
−1122%
110−120
+1122%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−1150%
200−210
+1150%
Valorant 50−55
−1150%
650−700
+1150%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
−1167%
190−200
+1167%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−1167%
190−200
+1167%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 65−70
−1150%
850−900
+1150%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−1150%
100−105
+1150%
Dota 2 30−35
−1076%
400−450
+1076%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−1173%
140−150
+1173%
Fortnite 21−24
−1173%
280−290
+1173%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−1178%
230−240
+1178%
Forza Horizon 5 9−10
−1122%
110−120
+1122%
God of War 9−10
−1122%
110−120
+1122%
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
−1150%
150−160
+1150%
Metro Exodus 7−8
−1186%
90−95
+1186%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−1150%
200−210
+1150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−1150%
150−160
+1150%
Valorant 50−55
−1150%
650−700
+1150%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
−1167%
190−200
+1167%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−1150%
100−105
+1150%
Dota 2 30−35
−1076%
400−450
+1076%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−1173%
140−150
+1173%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−1178%
230−240
+1178%
God of War 9−10
−1122%
110−120
+1122%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−1150%
200−210
+1150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−1150%
150−160
+1150%
Valorant 50−55
−1150%
650−700
+1150%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 21−24
−1173%
280−290
+1173%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−1186%
90−95
+1186%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 27−30
−1107%
350−400
+1107%
Grand Theft Auto V 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−1029%
350−400
+1029%
Valorant 35−40
−1182%
500−550
+1182%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−1150%
75−80
+1150%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−1122%
110−120
+1122%
God of War 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−1150%
50−55
+1150%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 7−8
−1186%
90−95
+1186%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−1150%
200−210
+1150%
Valorant 18−20
−1163%
240−250
+1163%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
Dota 2 12−14
−1150%
150−160
+1150%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−1150%
50−55
+1150%
God of War 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−1150%
50−55
+1150%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 4−5
−1150%
50−55
+1150%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.75 48.30
Recency 13 May 2019 4 June 2025
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 150 Watt

Radeon 630 has 200% lower power consumption.

RX 9060 XT 8 GB, on the other hand, has a 1188% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 9060 XT 8 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 630 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon 630 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX 9060 XT 8 GB is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 630
Radeon 630
AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 8 GB
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 34 votes

Rate Radeon 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 89 votes

Rate Radeon RX 9060 XT 8 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 630 or Radeon RX 9060 XT 8 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.