Playstation 4 Slim GPU vs Radeon 630

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking705not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency5.15no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code namePolaris 23Liverpool 16nm
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date13 May 2019 (5 years ago)7 September 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$399

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5121152
Core clock speed1082 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speed1218 MHzno data
Number of transistors2,200 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate38.9857.60
Floating-point processing power1.247 TFLOPS1.843 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs3272

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8IGP
Lengthno data288 mm
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1375 MHz
Memory bandwidth112.0 GB/s176.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)11.1*
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 May 2019 7 September 2016
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 75 Watt

Radeon 630 has an age advantage of 2 years, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 50% lower power consumption.

Playstation 4 Slim GPU, on the other hand, has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 630 and Playstation 4 Slim GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 630 is a notebook card while Playstation 4 Slim GPU is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 630
Radeon 630
AMD Playstation 4 Slim GPU
Playstation 4 Slim GPU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 32 votes

Rate Radeon 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 127 votes

Rate Playstation 4 Slim GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.