GeForce RTX 2060 Super vs Radeon 630

Place in the ranking	706	90
Place by popularity	not in top-100	15
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	46.42
Power efficiency	5.41	16.89
Architecture	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	Polaris 23	TU106
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	13 May 2019 (5 years ago)	9 July 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	512	2176
Core clock speed	1082 MHz	1470 MHz
Boost clock speed	1218 MHz	1650 MHz
Number of transistors	2,200 million	10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	175 Watt
Texture fill rate	38.98	224.4
Floating-point processing power	1.247 TFLOPS	7.181 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	64
TMUs	32	136
Tensor Cores	no data	272
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	34

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	no data	229 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz	1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth	112.0 GB/s	448.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI	+	+
G-SYNC support	-	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131
CUDA	-	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Radeon 630 3.75

RTX 2060 Super 40.98
+993%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Radeon 630 1512

RTX 2060 Super 16505
+992%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	10−12 −1080%	118 +1080%
1440p	6−7 −1033%	68 +1033%
4K	3−4 −1333%	43 +1333%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	3.38
1440p	no data	5.87
4K	no data	9.28

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	10−11 −810%	91 +810%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 −878%	88 +878%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	10−12 −718%	90 +718%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 −630%	73 +630%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 −756%	77 +756%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 −1241%	228 +1241%
Forza Horizon 5	6−7 −1950%	123 +1950%
Metro Exodus	9−10 −1311%	127 +1311%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 −838%	122 +838%
Valorant	9−10 −2144%	202 +2144%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	10−12 −1318%	156 +1318%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 −540%	64 +540%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 −644%	67 +644%
Dota 2	12−14 −1225%	159 +1225%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −481%	122 +481%
Fortnite	21−24 −548%	149 +548%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 −982%	184 +982%
Forza Horizon 5	6−7 −1400%	90 +1400%
Grand Theft Auto V	12−14 −1058%	139 +1058%
Metro Exodus	9−10 −911%	91 +911%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	30−35 −609%	241 +609%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 −354%	59 +354%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 −1092%	150−160 +1092%
Valorant	9−10 −1067%	105 +1067%
World of Tanks	65−70 −316%	270−280 +316%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	10−12 −645%	82 +645%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 −490%	59 +490%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 −544%	58 +544%
Dota 2	12−14 −1442%	185 +1442%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −386%	100−110 +386%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 −818%	156 +818%
Forza Horizon 5	6−7 −1433%	92 +1433%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	30−35 −274%	127 +274%
Valorant	9−10 −1900%	180 +1900%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	3−4 −2767%	86 +2767%
Grand Theft Auto V	3−4 −2767%	86 +2767%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	27−30 −500%	160−170 +500%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −1167%	38 +1167%
World of Tanks	27−30 −871%	270−280 +871%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	5−6 −1380%	74 +1380%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −850%	38 +850%
Far Cry 5	9−10 −1433%	130−140 +1433%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −2180%	114 +2180%
Forza Horizon 5	5−6 −1080%	59 +1080%
Metro Exodus	0−1	87
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7−8 −1014%	75−80 +1014%
Valorant	10−12 −936%	114 +936%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	10−11 −100%	20−22 +100%
Dota 2	16−18 −419%	83 +419%
Grand Theft Auto V	16−18 −419%	83 +419%
Metro Exodus	0−1	31
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	10−12 −1155%	138 +1155%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 −1100%	24 +1100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −419%	83 +419%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	3−4 −1300%	42 +1300%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 +0%	10 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −800%	18 +800%
Dota 2	16−18 −656%	121 +656%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −1550%	65−70 +1550%
Fortnite	3−4 −2000%	60−65 +2000%
Forza Horizon 4	2−3 −3150%	65 +3150%
Forza Horizon 5	2−3 −1550%	33 +1550%
Valorant	4−5 −1375%	59 +1375%

This is how Radeon 630 and RTX 2060 Super compete in popular games:

RTX 2060 Super is 1080% faster in 1080p
RTX 2060 Super is 1033% faster in 1440p
RTX 2060 Super is 1333% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Forza Horizon 4, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 2060 Super is 3150% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RTX 2060 Super is ahead in 60 tests (98%)
there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	3.75	40.98
Recency	13 May 2019	9 July 2019
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	175 Watt

Radeon 630 has 250% lower power consumption.

RTX 2060 Super, on the other hand, has a 992.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 month, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 2060 Super is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 630 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon 630 is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 2060 Super is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.