GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs Radeon 630

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon 630 and GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Radeon 630
2019
2 GB GDDR5, 50 Watt
3.88

RTX 2050 Mobile outperforms 630 by a whopping 377% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking706301
Place by popularitynot in top-10029
Power efficiency5.4128.67
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code namePolaris 23GA107
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date13 May 2019 (5 years ago)17 December 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5122048
Core clock speed1082 MHz1185 MHz
Boost clock speed1218 MHz1477 MHz
Number of transistors2,200 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate38.9894.53
Floating-point processing power1.247 TFLOPS6.05 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs3264
Tensor Coresno data256
Ray Tracing Coresno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth112.0 GB/s112.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI++
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA-8.6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD8−9
−425%
42
+425%
1440p6−7
−450%
33
+450%
4K5−6
−400%
25
+400%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−260%
36
+260%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−444%
49
+444%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 10−12
−445%
60−65
+445%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−240%
34
+240%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−133%
21
+133%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−347%
76
+347%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
−717%
49
+717%
Metro Exodus 8−9
−538%
50−55
+538%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−238%
40−45
+238%
Valorant 9−10
−867%
87
+867%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−12
−445%
60−65
+445%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−170%
27
+170%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−66.7%
15
+66.7%
Dota 2 12−14
−608%
85
+608%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−233%
70
+233%
Fortnite 21−24
−335%
100−105
+335%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−271%
63
+271%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
−733%
50−55
+733%
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
−475%
69
+475%
Metro Exodus 8−9
−538%
50−55
+538%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−276%
120−130
+276%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−238%
40−45
+238%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−346%
55−60
+346%
Valorant 9−10
−378%
43
+378%
World of Tanks 65−70
−233%
220−230
+233%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 10−12
−445%
60−65
+445%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−130%
23
+130%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−44.4%
13
+44.4%
Dota 2 12−14
−817%
110
+817%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−200%
60−65
+200%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−229%
56
+229%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
−450%
33
+450%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−276%
120−130
+276%
Valorant 9−10
−744%
75−80
+744%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 3−4
−1133%
37
+1133%
Grand Theft Auto V 3−4
−1133%
37
+1133%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
−546%
160−170
+546%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−467%
16−18
+467%
World of Tanks 27−30
−357%
120−130
+357%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
−660%
35−40
+660%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−275%
14−16
+275%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−444%
45−50
+444%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−840%
47
+840%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6
−500%
30−33
+500%
Metro Exodus 0−1 40−45
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−271%
24−27
+271%
Valorant 10−12
−336%
45−50
+336%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%
Dota 2 16−18
−100%
30−35
+100%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−100%
30−35
+100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
−409%
55−60
+409%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−500%
12−14
+500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−100%
30−35
+100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−500%
18−20
+500%
Counter-Strike 2 6−7
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
Dota 2 16−18
−113%
34
+113%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−500%
24−27
+500%
Fortnite 3−4
−633%
21−24
+633%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−1300%
27−30
+1300%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
−650%
14−16
+650%
Valorant 4−5
−450%
21−24
+450%

4K
High Preset

Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

This is how Radeon 630 and RTX 2050 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2050 Mobile is 425% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2050 Mobile is 450% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2050 Mobile is 400% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 2050 Mobile is 1300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 2050 Mobile is ahead in 61 test (98%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.88 18.50
Recency 13 May 2019 17 December 2021
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 45 Watt

RTX 2050 Mobile has a 376.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 75% more advanced lithography process, and 11.1% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 630 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 630
Radeon 630
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 33 votes

Rate Radeon 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 2384 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.