Radeon 780M vs 550

Place in performance ranking	594	283
Place by popularity	not in top-100	57
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	4.37	no data
Architecture	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)	RDNA 3
GPU code name	Lexa	Phoenix
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	20 April 2017 (7 years ago)	5 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$79	no data
Current price	$94 (1.2x MSRP)	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	512	768
Core clock speed	1100 MHz	1500 MHz
Boost clock speed	1183 MHz	3000 MHz
Number of transistors	2,200 million	25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	54 Watt (35 - 54 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate	37.86	139.2

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon 550 and Radeon 780M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	145 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	System Shared
Memory bus width	64 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	7 GB/s	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	56 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	no data	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.0b, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a	Portable Device Dependent
HDMI	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.7	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.1	2.1
Vulkan	1.3	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Radeon 550 5.07

Radeon 780M 18.35
+262%

780M outperforms 550 by 262% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Radeon 550 1959

Radeon 780M 7087
+262%

780M outperforms 550 by 262% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	9−10 −300%	36 +300%
1440p	5−6 −320%	21 +320%
4K	3−4 −367%	14 +367%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

10−11

−290%

39
+290%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 −300%	35−40 +300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	8−9 −288%	30−35 +288%
Battlefield 5	16−18 −275%	60−65 +275%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11 −270%	35−40 +270%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 −288%	31 +288%
Far Cry 5	10−11 −330%	40−45 +330%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 −308%	45−50 +308%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 −300%	80−85 +300%
Hitman 3	9−10 −300%	35−40 +300%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27 −304%	97 +304%
Metro Exodus	16−18 −281%	60−65 +281%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 −264%	50−55 +264%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18 −300%	64 +300%
Watch Dogs: Legion	10−11 −310%	41 +310%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 −300%	35−40 +300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	8−9 −288%	30−35 +288%
Battlefield 5	16−18 −275%	60−65 +275%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11 −270%	35−40 +270%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −300%	24 +300%
Far Cry 5	10−11 −330%	40−45 +330%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 −308%	45−50 +308%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 −300%	80−85 +300%
Hitman 3	9−10 −300%	35−40 +300%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 −306%	70−75 +306%
Metro Exodus	5−6 −320%	21 +320%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 −264%	50−55 +264%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	14−16 −279%	53 +279%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 −283%	46 +283%
Watch Dogs: Legion	14−16 −300%	55−60 +300%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 −300%	35−40 +300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	8−9 −288%	30−35 +288%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11 −270%	35−40 +270%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −283%	23 +283%
Far Cry 5	10−11 −330%	40−45 +330%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 −300%	80−85 +300%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 −279%	53 +279%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 −283%	46 +283%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	8−9 −263%	29 +263%
Watch Dogs: Legion	4−5 −350%	18 +350%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

14−16

−264%

50−55
+264%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	9−10 −289%	35−40 +289%
Far Cry New Dawn	9−10 −300%	35−40 +300%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −280%	18−20 +280%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 −300%	16−18 +300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 −283%	21−24 +283%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −400%	10−11 +400%
Far Cry 5	7−8 −286%	27 +286%
Forza Horizon 4	9−10 −300%	35−40 +300%
Hitman 3	6−7 −267%	21−24 +267%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 −270%	35−40 +270%
Metro Exodus	9−10 −278%	30−35 +278%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 −300%	32 +300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −300%	20 +300%
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4 −300%	12−14 +300%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

8−9
−275%

30−33

+275%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	4−5 −350%	18−20 +350%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −367%	14−16 +367%
Hitman 3	3−4 −367%	14−16 +367%
Horizon Zero Dawn	5−6 −300%	20−22 +300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	3−4 −300%	12−14 +300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −275%	15 +275%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −267%	10−12 +267%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 −350%	9−10 +350%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −400%	10−11 +400%
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	3−4
Far Cry 5	2−3 −400%	10−11 +400%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −317%	24−27 +317%
Horizon Zero Dawn	5−6 −300%	20−22 +300%
Metro Exodus	4−5 −325%	16−18 +325%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 −600%	7−8 +600%