Quadro Plex 1000 Model IV vs Radeon 540

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking715not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.10no data
Power efficiency4.95no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameLexaG80
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date20 April 2017 (7 years ago)25 July 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$79 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384128
Core clock speed1183 MHz600 MHz
Boost clock speed1124 MHzno data
Number of transistors2,200 million681 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt320 Watt
Texture fill rate28.3938.40
Floating-point processing power0.9085 TFLOPS0.3456 TFLOPS
ROPs1624
TMUs2432

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 1.0 x16
Length145 mm522 mm
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB1536 MB
Memory bus width32 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth24 GB/s76.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DisplayPort 1.4aNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.74.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.11.1
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 April 2017 25 July 2008
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 1536 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 320 Watt

Radeon 540 has an age advantage of 8 years, a 542.9% more advanced lithography process, and 540% lower power consumption.

Plex 1000 Model IV, on the other hand, has a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 540 and Quadro Plex 1000 Model IV. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 540 is a desktop card while Quadro Plex 1000 Model IV is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 540
Radeon 540
NVIDIA Quadro Plex 1000 Model IV
Quadro Plex 1000 Model IV

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 46 votes

Rate Radeon 540 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro Plex 1000 Model IV on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.