ATI Radeon 7200 64 MB vs 530

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking881not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.80no data
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Rage 6 (2000−2007)
GPU code nameWestonR100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date18 April 2017 (8 years ago)1 April 2000 (26 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384no data
Core clock speed730 MHz166 MHz
Boost clock speed1024 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,550 million30 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt23 Watt
Texture fill rate24.581
Floating-point processing power0.7864 TFLOPSno data
ROPs82
TMUs246
L1 Cache96 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8AGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3/GDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount4 GB64 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz166 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s5.312 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)7.0
Shader Model6.3no data
OpenGL4.61.3
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 April 2017 1 April 2000
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 23 Watt

Radeon 530 has an age advantage of 17 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 543% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 7200 64 MB, on the other hand, has 117% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 530 and Radeon 7200 64 MB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 530 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon 7200 64 MB is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 807 votes

Rate Radeon 530 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 4 votes

Rate Radeon 7200 64 MB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 530 or Radeon 7200 64 MB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.