GeForce GT 720 vs Radeon 530

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon 530 with GeForce GT 720, including specs and performance data.

Radeon 530
2017
4 GB DDR3/GDDR5, 50 Watt
2.66
+66.3%

530 outperforms GT 720 by an impressive 66% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking813960
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.02
Power efficiency3.655.77
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015)
GPU code nameWestonGK208B
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date18 April 2017 (7 years ago)29 September 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$49

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384192
Core clock speed730 MHz797 MHz
Boost clock speed1024 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,550 million915 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt19 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data98 °C
Texture fill rate24.5812.75
Floating-point processing power0.7864 TFLOPS0.306 TFLOPS
ROPs88
TMUs2416

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCI Express 2.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 2.0 x8
Lengthno data145 mm
Heightno data2.713" (6.9 cm)
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3/GDDR5DDR3 / GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB1 GB or 1 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1.8 GBps or 5.0 GB/s
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s14.4 (DDR3) or 40 (GDDR5)
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsDual Link DVI-DHDMIVGA
Multi monitor supportno data3 displays
HDMI-+
HDCP-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataInternal

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray-+
3D Gaming-+
3D Vision-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.35.1
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.126
CUDA-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Radeon 530 2.66
+66.3%
GT 720 1.60

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Radeon 530 1025
+66.7%
GT 720 615

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Radeon 530 1542
+111%
GT 720 730

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Radeon 530 5015
+113%
GT 720 2350

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD15
+66.7%
9−10
−66.7%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data5.44

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16
+77.8%
9−10
−77.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1
Battlefield 5 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8
+100%
4−5
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Far Cry 5 10
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 12
+71.4%
7−8
−71.4%
Forza Horizon 4 35
+66.7%
21−24
−66.7%
Hitman 3 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+75%
12−14
−75%
Metro Exodus 13
+85.7%
7−8
−85.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 13
+85.7%
7−8
−85.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18
+80%
10−11
−80%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+81%
21−24
−81%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1
Battlefield 5 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7
+75%
4−5
−75%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Forza Horizon 4 32
+77.8%
18−20
−77.8%
Hitman 3 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+75%
12−14
−75%
Metro Exodus 5
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9
+80%
5−6
−80%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+85.7%
7−8
−85.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+81%
21−24
−81%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+85.7%
7−8
−85.7%
Hitman 3 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+75%
12−14
−75%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6
+100%
3−4
−100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+81%
21−24
−81%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Hitman 3 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16
+66.7%
9−10
−66.7%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%

This is how Radeon 530 and GT 720 compete in popular games:

  • Radeon 530 is 67% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.66 1.60
Recency 18 April 2017 29 September 2014
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 1 GB or 1 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 19 Watt

Radeon 530 has a 66.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

GT 720, on the other hand, has 163.2% lower power consumption.

The Radeon 530 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 720 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon 530 is a notebook card while GeForce GT 720 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 530
Radeon 530
NVIDIA GeForce GT 720
GeForce GT 720

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 726 votes

Rate Radeon 530 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 470 votes

Rate GeForce GT 720 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.