Radeon RX 550X vs 520

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon 520 with Radeon RX 550X, including specs and performance data.

Radeon 520
2017
2 GB GDDR5, 50 Watt
2.05

RX 550X outperforms 520 by a whopping 196% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking883587
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.838.36
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameBanksLexa
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date18 April 2017 (7 years ago)16 December 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320512
Core clock speed1030 MHz1100 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1183 MHz
Number of transistors690 million2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate20.6037.86
Floating-point processing power0.6592 TFLOPS1.211 TFLOPS
ROPs816
TMUs2032

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x8
Lengthno data145 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1125 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth36 GB/s96 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Radeon 520 2.05
RX 550X 6.06
+196%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Radeon 520 787
RX 550X 2331
+196%

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Radeon 520 5324
RX 550X 11306
+112%

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

Radeon 520 4434
RX 550X 12473
+181%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD13
−169%
35−40
+169%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−170%
27−30
+170%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−180%
14−16
+180%
Elden Ring 3−4
−167%
8−9
+167%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−170%
27−30
+170%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−180%
14−16
+180%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−173%
30−33
+173%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−163%
21−24
+163%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−170%
27−30
+170%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−180%
14−16
+180%
Dota 2 6
−167%
16−18
+167%
Elden Ring 3−4
−167%
8−9
+167%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−169%
35−40
+169%
Fortnite 10−11
−170%
27−30
+170%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−173%
30−33
+173%
Grand Theft Auto V 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18
−178%
50−55
+178%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−163%
21−24
+163%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−167%
24−27
+167%
World of Tanks 35−40
−182%
110−120
+182%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−170%
27−30
+170%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−180%
14−16
+180%
Dota 2 18
−178%
50−55
+178%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−169%
35−40
+169%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−173%
30−33
+173%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22
−175%
55−60
+175%

1440p
High Preset

Elden Ring 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
−186%
40−45
+186%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
World of Tanks 12−14
−169%
35−40
+169%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−167%
24−27
+167%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−167%
8−9
+167%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−167%
16−18
+167%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−167%
8−9
+167%
Valorant 8−9
−163%
21−24
+163%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18
−181%
45−50
+181%
Elden Ring 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−167%
40−45
+167%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−167%
16−18
+167%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−167%
40−45
+167%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Dota 2 16−18
−181%
45−50
+181%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
Fortnite 0−1 0−1
Valorant 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%

This is how Radeon 520 and RX 550X compete in popular games:

  • RX 550X is 169% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.05 6.06
Recency 18 April 2017 16 December 2018
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm

RX 550X has a 195.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 550X is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 520 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon 520 is a notebook card while Radeon RX 550X is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 520
Radeon 520
AMD Radeon RX 550X
Radeon RX 550X

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 339 votes

Rate Radeon 520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 117 votes

Rate Radeon RX 550X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.