Radeon R5E Mobile Graphics vs RTX TITAN Ada

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameAD102Beema
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date2023 (1 year ago)6 June 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores18432128
Core clock speedno data800 MHz
Boost clock speed2520 MHz847 MHz
Number of transistors76,300 million930 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)800 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate1,4526.400
Floating-point processing powerno data0.2048 gflops
ROPs1924
TMUs5768

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16IGP
Length336 mmno data
WidthQuad-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 16-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6XSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount48 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width384 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed24 GB/sSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth1,152 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4aPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.76.5 (6.0)
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.1
Vulkan1.31.2.170
CUDA8.9-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 5 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 800 Watt 15 Watt

RTX TITAN Ada has a 460% more advanced lithography process.

R5E Mobile Graphics, on the other hand, has 5233.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between RTX TITAN Ada and Radeon R5E Mobile Graphics. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that RTX TITAN Ada is a desktop card while Radeon R5E Mobile Graphics is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX TITAN Ada
RTX TITAN Ada
AMD Radeon R5E Mobile Graphics
Radeon R5E Mobile Graphics

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 11 votes

Rate RTX TITAN Ada on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon R5E Mobile Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.