Radeon 530 Mobile DDR3 vs RTX TITAN Ada Generation

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureAda LovelaceGCN 3.0 (2014−2017)
GPU code nameAD102Weston
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date2023 (1 year ago)18 April 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores18432384
Boost clock speed2520 MHz1021 MHz
Number of transistors76,300 million1,550 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)800 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate1,45224.50

Form factor & compatibility

Information on RTX TITAN Ada Generation and Radeon 530 Mobile DDR3 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Length336 mmno data
WidthQuad-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 16-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6XDDR3
Maximum RAM amount48 GB2 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed24 GB/s1800 MBps
Memory bandwidth1,152 GB/s14.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4aPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.76.5 (6.0)
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.1
Vulkan1.31.2.170
CUDA8.9no data

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 48 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 4 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 800 Watt 50 Watt

We couldn't decide between RTX TITAN Ada Generation and Radeon 530 Mobile DDR3. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that RTX TITAN Ada Generation is a desktop card while Radeon 530 Mobile DDR3 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX TITAN Ada Generation
RTX TITAN Ada Generation
AMD Radeon 530 Mobile DDR3
Radeon 530 Mobile DDR3

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 11 votes

Rate RTX TITAN Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.3 4 votes

Rate Radeon 530 Mobile DDR3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.