Radeon R5 (Carrizo) vs RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
2000 Blackwell 4000 Blackwell 4000 Blackwell SFF 4500 Blackwell 5000 72 GB Blackwell 5000 Blackwell 6000 6000 Blackwell 6000 Blackwell Max-Q 6000 Blackwell Server
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
(Beema/Carrizo-L) (Bristol Ridge) (Carrizo) (Kaveri) (Stoney Ridge) A230 A330 A335 M230 M230 Rebrand M240 M240 Rebrand M255 M315 M320 M330 M335 M420 M430 M435 Mobile Graphics

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell with Radeon R5 (Carrizo), including specs and performance data.

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
2025
16 GB GDDR7, 70 Watt
34.32
+1931%

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell outperforms R5 (Carrizo) by a whopping 1931% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
R5 (Carrizo) R5 (Carrizo)

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking165981
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency37.623.70
ArchitectureBlackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)GCN 1.2/2.0 (2015−2016)
GPU code nameGB206Carrizo
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date11 August 2025 (less than a year ago)4 June 2015 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4352256
Core clock speed982 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1957 MHz800 MHz
Number of transistors21,900 million2410 Million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)70 Watt12-35 Watt
Texture fill rate266.2no data
Floating-point processing power17.03 TFLOPSno data
ROPs64no data
TMUs136no data
Tensor Cores136no data
Ray Tracing Cores34no data
L1 Cache4.3 MBno data
L2 Cache32 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 5.0 x8no data
Length167 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR7no data
Maximum RAM amount16 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bit64/128 Bit
Memory clock speed1125 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1bno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (FL 12_0)
Shader Model6.8no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan1.4-
CUDA12.0-
DLSS+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Fortnite 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Dota 2 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Fortnite 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Dota 2 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 53 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 34.32 1.69
Recency 11 August 2025 4 June 2015
Chip lithography 5 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 70 Watt 12 Watt

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell has a 1930.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

R5 (Carrizo), on the other hand, has 483.3% lower power consumption.

The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R5 (Carrizo) in performance tests.

Be aware that RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is a workstation graphics card while Radeon R5 (Carrizo) is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
AMD Radeon R5 (Carrizo)
Radeon R5 (Carrizo)
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
vs
Pro W5700 Radeon Pro W5700
R5 (Carrizo) Radeon R5 (Carrizo)
vs
GT 740A GeForce GT 740A
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
vs
Pro Vega II Duo Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
Arc Graphics 130T Intel Graphics 130T
vs
Arc 7 A730M A730M
Radeon 840M Radeon 840M
vs
RX 490M 490M
Radeon 840M Radeon 840M
vs
K1100M K1100M
Radeon 840M Radeon 840M
vs
Apple M4 32-core GPU core GPU
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell NVIDIA PRO 2000 Blackwell
vs
HD 8750M 8750M
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell NVIDIA PRO 2000 Blackwell
vs
Radeon 660M 660M
RX 9060 AMD RX 9060
vs
GTX 650 Ti Boost 650 Ti Boost
RX 9060 AMD RX 9060
vs
P104-100 100
RX 9060 AMD RX 9060
vs
A16 PCIe PCIe
R9 390X AMD R9 390X
vs
GTX 1060 5 GB 1060 5 GB

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

5 1 vote

Rate RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 6 votes

Rate Radeon R5 (Carrizo) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell or Radeon R5 (Carrizo), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.