Quadro M4000M vs RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
PRO 2000 Blackwell PRO 4000 Blackwell PRO 4500 Blackwell PRO 5000 Blackwell PRO 6000 PRO 6000 Blackwell PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q PRO 6000 Blackwell Server
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
M1000M M1200 M2000M M2200 M3000M M4000M M5000M M5500

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell with Quadro M4000M, including specs and performance data.

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
2025
16 GB GDDR7, 70 Watt
34.28
+134%

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell outperforms M4000M by a whopping 134% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
M4000M M4000M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking162382
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency37.3111.14
ArchitectureBlackwell 2.0 (2025)Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameGB206GM204
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date11 August 2025 (recently)18 August 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores43521,280
Core clock speed790 MHz975 MHz
Boost clock speed1950 MHz1013 MHz
Number of transistors21,900 million5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)70 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate265.278.00
Floating-point processing power16.97 TFLOPS2.496 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs13680
Tensor Cores136no data
Ray Tracing Cores34no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 5.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Length167 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR7GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount16 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1125 MHz1253 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/s160 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1bNo outputs
Display Portno data1.2

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+
3D Vision Prono data+
Mosaicno data+
nView Display Managementno data+
Optimusno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12
Shader Model6.86.4
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL3.01.2
Vulkan1.4+
CUDA12.05.2
DLSS+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell 34.28
+134%
M4000M 14.62

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell 14363
+134%
M4000M 6128

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD140−150
+122%
63
−122%
4K45−50
+125%
20
−125%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
God of War 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Fortnite 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
God of War 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Valorant 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Dota 2 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Fortnite 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
God of War 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Valorant 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Dota 2 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
God of War 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Valorant 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Valorant 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
God of War 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Metro Exodus 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Valorant 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Dota 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
God of War 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

This is how RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell and M4000M compete in popular games:

  • RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is 122% faster in 1080p
  • RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is 125% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 65 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 34.28 14.62
Recency 11 August 2025 18 August 2015
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 5 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 70 Watt 100 Watt

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell has a 134.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 460% more advanced lithography process, and 42.9% lower power consumption.

The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro M4000M in performance tests.

Be aware that RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is a workstation graphics card while Quadro M4000M is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
Quadro M4000M
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

M4000M Quadro M4000M
vs
P2000 Mobile Quadro P2000 Mobile
M5000M Quadro M5000M
vs
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
vs
M5000M Quadro M5000M
M5000M Quadro M5000M
vs
RX 7400 Radeon RX 7400
RX 9060 Radeon RX 9060
vs
M5000M Quadro M5000M
M4000M Quadro M4000M
vs
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF
M4000M Quadro M4000M
vs
RX 7400 Radeon RX 7400
RX 9060 Radeon RX 9060
vs
M4000M Quadro M4000M
R9 M485X Radeon R9 M485X
vs
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
vs
R9 M485X Radeon R9 M485X
R9 M485X Radeon R9 M485X
vs
RX 7400 Radeon RX 7400

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

No user ratings yet.

Rate RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 148 votes

Rate Quadro M4000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell or Quadro M4000M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.