Arc A530M vs RTX A5500 Mobile
Aggregate performance score
We've compared RTX A5500 Mobile with Arc A530M, including specs and performance data.
RTX A5500 Mobile outperforms A530M by a whopping 115% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 108 | 317 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 19.05 | 22.58 |
| Architecture | Ampere (2020−2025) | Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) |
| GPU code name | GA103 | DG2-256 |
| Market segment | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 22 March 2022 (3 years ago) | 1 August 2023 (2 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 7424 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 975 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1500 MHz | 1300 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 22,000 million | 11,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 6 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 165 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 348.0 | 124.8 |
| Floating-point processing power | 22.27 TFLOPS | 3.994 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 96 | 48 |
| TMUs | 232 | 96 |
| Tensor Cores | 232 | 192 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 58 | 12 |
| L1 Cache | 7.3 MB | no data |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 8 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 1750 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 512.0 GB/s | 224.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
| Resizable BAR | + | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | Portable Device Dependent |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 6.8 | 6.6 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| CUDA | 8.6 | - |
| DLSS | + | + |
Synthetic benchmarks
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 125
+127%
| 55−60
−127%
|
| 1440p | 75
+150%
| 30−35
−150%
|
| 4K | 50
+138%
| 21−24
−138%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 220−230
+104%
|
110−120
−104%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 129
+215%
|
40−45
−215%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 130−140
+69.1%
|
80−85
−69.1%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 220−230
+104%
|
110−120
−104%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 114
+178%
|
40−45
−178%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 120−130
+55.1%
|
75−80
−55.1%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 130−140
+105%
|
60−65
−105%
|
| Fortnite | 170−180
+73.5%
|
100−110
−73.5%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 150−160
+101%
|
75−80
−101%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 130−140
+113%
|
60−65
−113%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 160−170
+116%
|
70−75
−116%
|
| Valorant | 230−240
+61.6%
|
140−150
−61.6%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 130−140
+69.1%
|
80−85
−69.1%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 220−230
+104%
|
110−120
−104%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 270−280
+19.3%
|
230−240
−19.3%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 88
+115%
|
40−45
−115%
|
| Dota 2 | 164
+119%
|
75−80
−119%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 120−130
+55.1%
|
75−80
−55.1%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 130−140
+105%
|
60−65
−105%
|
| Fortnite | 170−180
+73.5%
|
100−110
−73.5%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 150−160
+101%
|
75−80
−101%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 130−140
+113%
|
60−65
−113%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 145
+101%
|
70−75
−101%
|
| Metro Exodus | 99
+136%
|
40−45
−136%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 160−170
+116%
|
70−75
−116%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 205
+273%
|
55−60
−273%
|
| Valorant | 230−240
+61.6%
|
140−150
−61.6%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 130−140
+69.1%
|
80−85
−69.1%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 76
+85.4%
|
40−45
−85.4%
|
| Dota 2 | 155
+121%
|
70−75
−121%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 120−130
+55.1%
|
75−80
−55.1%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 130−140
+105%
|
60−65
−105%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 150−160
+101%
|
75−80
−101%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 160−170
+116%
|
70−75
−116%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 102
+85.5%
|
55−60
−85.5%
|
| Valorant | 230−240
+61.6%
|
140−150
−61.6%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 170−180
+73.5%
|
100−110
−73.5%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 100−110
+168%
|
40−45
−168%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 290−300
+106%
|
140−150
−106%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 99
+191%
|
30−35
−191%
|
| Metro Exodus | 59
+136%
|
24−27
−136%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 170−180
+2.3%
|
170−180
−2.3%
|
| Valorant | 260−270
+47.5%
|
180−190
−47.5%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 100−110
+89.1%
|
55−60
−89.1%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 45
+150%
|
18−20
−150%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 95−100
+133%
|
40−45
−133%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 100−110
+130%
|
40−45
−130%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 120−130
+145%
|
45−50
−145%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 80−85
+167%
|
30−33
−167%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 110−120
+147%
|
45−50
−147%
|
4K
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 45−50
+188%
|
16−18
−188%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 97
+169%
|
35−40
−169%
|
| Metro Exodus | 31
+93.8%
|
16−18
−93.8%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 63
+125%
|
27−30
−125%
|
| Valorant | 250−260
+126%
|
110−120
−126%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 65−70
+120%
|
30−33
−120%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 45−50
+188%
|
16−18
−188%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 18
+125%
|
8−9
−125%
|
| Dota 2 | 132
+120%
|
60−65
−120%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 50−55
+174%
|
18−20
−174%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 55−60
+155%
|
21−24
−155%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 80−85
+135%
|
30−35
−135%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 55−60
+190%
|
20−22
−190%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 55−60
+175%
|
20−22
−175%
|
This is how RTX A5500 Mobile and Arc A530M compete in popular games:
- RTX A5500 Mobile is 127% faster in 1080p
- RTX A5500 Mobile is 150% faster in 1440p
- RTX A5500 Mobile is 138% faster in 4K
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX A5500 Mobile is 273% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- Without exception, RTX A5500 Mobile surpassed Arc A530M in all 61 of our tests.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 41.05 | 19.11 |
| Recency | 22 March 2022 | 1 August 2023 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 8 GB |
| Chip lithography | 8 nm | 6 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 165 Watt | 65 Watt |
RTX A5500 Mobile has a 114.8% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.
Arc A530M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 33.3% more advanced lithography process, and 153.8% lower power consumption.
The RTX A5500 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc A530M in performance tests.
Be aware that RTX A5500 Mobile is a mobile workstation graphics card while Arc A530M is a mobile workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
