Radeon HD 7350 PCI vs Arc A350M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking419not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency40.22no data
ArchitectureGeneration 12.7 (2022−2023)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameDG2-128Cedar
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date30 March 2022 (3 years ago)5 January 2012 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores76880
Core clock speed300 MHz650 MHz
Boost clock speed1150 MHzno data
Number of transistors7,200 million292 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt19 Watt
Texture fill rate55.205.200
Floating-point processing power1.766 TFLOPSno data
ROPs244
TMUs488
Ray Tracing Cores6no data
L1 Cache1.1 MBno data
L2 Cache4 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCI
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data1-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount4 GB512 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth112.0 GB/s8 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model6.6no data
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan1.3-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 March 2022 5 January 2012
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 6 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 19 Watt

Arc A350M has an age advantage of 10 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 566.7% more advanced lithography process.

HD 7350 PCI, on the other hand, has 31.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Arc A350M and Radeon HD 7350 PCI. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Arc A350M is a notebook graphics card while Radeon HD 7350 PCI is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc A350M
Arc A350M
AMD Radeon HD 7350 PCI
Radeon HD 7350 PCI

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 76 votes

Rate Arc A350M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 53 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7350 PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Arc A350M or Radeon HD 7350 PCI, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.