ATI Radeon VE AGP vs RTX A500

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking308not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency20.31no data
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Rage 6 (2000−2007)
GPU code nameGA107Rage 6
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date10 November 2021 (3 years ago)19 February 2001 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048no data
Core clock speed1440 MHz183 MHz
Boost clock speed1770 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data30 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt23 Watt
Texture fill rate113.30.55
Floating-point processing power7.25 TFLOPSno data
ROPs321
TMUs643
Tensor Cores64no data
Ray Tracing Cores16no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8AGP 4x
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR
Maximum RAM amount4 GB32 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz183 MHz
Memory bandwidth112.0 GB/s2.928 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)7.0
Shader Model6.7no data
OpenGL4.61.3
OpenCL3.0N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA8.6-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 November 2021 19 February 2001
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 32 MB
Chip lithography 8 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 23 Watt

RTX A500 has an age advantage of 20 years, a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2150% more advanced lithography process.

ATI VE AGP, on the other hand, has 160.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between RTX A500 and Radeon VE AGP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that RTX A500 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon VE AGP is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX A500
RTX A500
ATI Radeon VE AGP
Radeon VE AGP

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 136 votes

Rate RTX A500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon VE AGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.