Arc 8-Core iGPU vs RTX A4500
Aggregate performance score
We've compared RTX A4500 with Arc 8-Core iGPU, including specs and performance data.
RTX A4500 outperforms Arc 8-Core iGPU by a whopping 203% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in the ranking | 46 | 302 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Power efficiency | 19.35 | no data |
Architecture | Ampere (2020−2024) | Xe LPG (2023) |
GPU code name | GA102 | Meteor Lake iGPU |
Market segment | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 23 November 2021 (3 years ago) | 14 December 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 7168 | 8 |
Core clock speed | 1050 MHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 1650 MHz | 2300 MHz |
Number of transistors | 28,300 million | no data |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 5 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 200 Watt | no data |
Texture fill rate | 369.6 | no data |
Floating-point processing power | 23.65 TFLOPS | no data |
ROPs | 96 | no data |
TMUs | 224 | no data |
Tensor Cores | 224 | no data |
Ray Tracing Cores | 56 | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | no data |
Length | 267 mm | no data |
Width | 2-slot | no data |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | GDDR6 | no data |
Maximum RAM amount | 20 GB | no data |
Memory bus width | 320 Bit | no data |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | no data |
Memory bandwidth | 640.0 GB/s | no data |
Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a | no data |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12_2 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | no data |
OpenGL | 4.6 | no data |
OpenCL | 3.0 | no data |
Vulkan | 1.3 | - |
CUDA | 8.6 | - |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 100−110
+178%
| 36
−178%
|
1440p | 55−60
+189%
| 19
−189%
|
4K | 45−50
+200%
| 15
−200%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 26
+0%
|
26
+0%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Battlefield 5 | 55−60
+0%
|
55−60
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 26
+0%
|
26
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 71
+0%
|
71
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 45−50
+0%
|
45−50
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 40
+0%
|
40
+0%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 40−45
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
Valorant | 75−80
+0%
|
75−80
+0%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Battlefield 5 | 55−60
+0%
|
55−60
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 23
+0%
|
23
+0%
|
Dota 2 | 25
+0%
|
25
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 34
+0%
|
34
+0%
|
Fortnite | 100−105
+0%
|
100−105
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 59
+0%
|
59
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 45−50
+0%
|
45−50
+0%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 25
+0%
|
25
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 29
+0%
|
29
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 120−130
+0%
|
120−130
+0%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 40−45
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 55−60
+0%
|
55−60
+0%
|
Valorant | 75−80
+0%
|
75−80
+0%
|
World of Tanks | 220−230
+0%
|
220−230
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 55−60
+0%
|
55−60
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 21
+0%
|
21
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 60−65
+0%
|
60−65
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 46
+0%
|
46
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 45−50
+0%
|
45−50
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 120−130
+0%
|
120−130
+0%
|
Valorant | 75−80
+0%
|
75−80
+0%
|
1440p
High Preset
Dota 2 | 11
+0%
|
11
+0%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 11
+0%
|
11
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 160−170
+0%
|
160−170
+0%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
World of Tanks | 120−130
+0%
|
120−130
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 35−40
+0%
|
35−40
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 11
+0%
|
11
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 45−50
+0%
|
45−50
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 30
+0%
|
30
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 27−30
+0%
|
27−30
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 40−45
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
Valorant | 45−50
+0%
|
45−50
+0%
|
4K
High Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
Dota 2 | 9
+0%
|
9
+0%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 9
+0%
|
9
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 55−60
+0%
|
55−60
+0%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 9
+0%
|
9
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 18−20
+0%
|
18−20
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
Fortnite | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 15
+0%
|
15
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
Valorant | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
This is how RTX A4500 and Arc 8-Core iGPU compete in popular games:
- RTX A4500 is 178% faster in 1080p
- RTX A4500 is 189% faster in 1440p
- RTX A4500 is 200% faster in 4K
All in all, in popular games:
- there's a draw in 56 tests (100%)
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 56.11 | 18.53 |
Recency | 23 November 2021 | 14 December 2023 |
Chip lithography | 8 nm | 5 nm |
RTX A4500 has a 202.8% higher aggregate performance score.
Arc 8-Core iGPU, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 60% more advanced lithography process.
The RTX A4500 is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc 8-Core iGPU in performance tests.
Be aware that RTX A4500 is a workstation card while Arc 8-Core iGPU is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.