Radeon RX 8050S vs RTX A400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
CMP 70HX CMP 90HX Quadro RTX A6000 A400 A500 A1000 A2000 A2000 12 GB A4000 A4500 A5000 A5500
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
5500M 5600M 6500M 6550M 6600M 6650M 6800M 7600M XT 7700S 8040S 8050S 8060S

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX A400 with Radeon RX 8050S, including specs and performance data.

RTX A400
2024
4 GB GDDR6, 50 Watt
14.12

8050S outperforms RTX A400 by a whopping 153% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
RTX A400 RTX A400
RX 8050S RX 8050S

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking398152
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency21.89no data
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2025)no data
GPU code nameGA107no data
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date16 April 2024 (1 year ago)6 January 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores76832
Core clock speed727 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1762 MHz2800 MHz
Number of transistors8,700 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology8 nmno data
Power consumption (TDP)50 Wattno data
Texture fill rate42.29no data
Floating-point processing power2.706 TFLOPSno data
ROPs16no data
TMUs24no data
Tensor Cores24no data
Ray Tracing Cores6no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8no data
Length163 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GBno data
Memory bus width64 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1500 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth96 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4ano data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)no data
Shader Model6.7no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan1.3-
CUDA8.6-
DLSS+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD35−40
−169%
94
+169%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Far Cry 5 100
+0%
100
+0%
Fortnite 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Valorant 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Far Cry 5 96
+0%
96
+0%
Fortnite 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 118
+0%
118
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Metro Exodus 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 156
+0%
156
+0%
Valorant 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Far Cry 5 85
+0%
85
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 92
+0%
92
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Valorant 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Valorant 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

This is how RTX A400 and RX 8050S compete in popular games:

  • RX 8050S is 169% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 60 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 14.12 35.68
Recency 16 April 2024 6 January 2025

RX 8050S has a 152.7% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 8 months.

The Radeon RX 8050S is our recommended choice as it beats the RTX A400 in performance tests.

Be aware that RTX A400 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 8050S is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA RTX A400
RTX A400
AMD Radeon RX 8050S
Radeon RX 8050S
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RTX A400 RTX A400
vs
Quadro K5200 Quadro K5200
RX 8050S Radeon RX 8050S
vs
RTX 5050 Mobile GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile
RTX A400 RTX A400
vs
FirePro W7100 FirePro W7100
L20 L20
vs
Switch 2 GPU Switch 2 GPU
RTX 4060 Ti AD104 4060 Ti AD104
vs
RTX 5090 D 5090 D
RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
vs
FirePro R5000 R5000
RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB 4060 Ti 16 GB
vs
GTX 1070 SLI 1070 SLI
RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
vs
Pro 570X Pro 570X
Arc 8-Core iGPU Arc 8 Core iGPU
vs
M4000M M4000M
Arc 8-Core iGPU Arc 8 Core iGPU
vs
R7 M360 R7 M360
Arc 8-Core iGPU Arc 8 Core iGPU
vs
Go 7600 GT Go 7600 GT
Arc 8-Core iGPU Arc 8 Core iGPU
vs
R9 285 R9 285
Arc 8-Core iGPU Arc 8 Core iGPU
vs
RTX A1000 Embedded RTX A1000 Embedded

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.9 46 votes

Rate RTX A400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon RX 8050S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about RTX A400 or Radeon RX 8050S, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.