Arc 140T Mobile vs ROG Ally GPU

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)Xe2-LPG (2025)
GPU code namePhoenixArrow Lake
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date2023 (2 years ago)13 January 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$599 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2561024
Core clock speed1500 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed2500 MHz2350 MHz
Number of transistors25,390 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology4 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate40.00150.4
Floating-point processing power2.56 TFLOPS4.813 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs1664
Tensor Coresno data128
Ray Tracing Cores48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8
Length280 mmno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount16 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1600 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth51.2 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.31.3
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 4 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 35 Watt

ROG Ally GPU has 16.7% lower power consumption.

Arc 140T Mobile, on the other hand, has a 33.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between ROG Ally GPU and Arc 140T Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that ROG Ally GPU is a desktop card while Arc 140T Mobile is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD ROG Ally GPU
ROG Ally GPU
Intel Arc 140T Mobile
Arc 140T

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 8 votes

Rate ROG Ally GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Arc 140T Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about ROG Ally GPU or Arc 140T Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.