Radeon Instinct MI325X vs RTX A400

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking417not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency15.73no data
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)CDNA 3.0 (2023−2024)
GPU code nameGA107Aqua Vanjaram
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date16 April 2024 (less than a year ago)2024 (recently)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores76819456
Core clock speed727 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed1762 MHz2100 MHz
Number of transistors8,700 million153,000 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt750 Watt
Texture fill rate42.292,554
Floating-point processing power2.706 TFLOPS81.72 TFLOPS
ROPs16no data
TMUs241216
Tensor Cores241216
Ray Tracing Cores6no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 5.0 x16
Length163 mmno data
Width1-slotOAM Module
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6HBM3e
Maximum RAM amount4 GB288 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit8192 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz2525 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s10.3 TB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4aNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)N/A
Shader Model6.7N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA8.6-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 288 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 750 Watt

RTX A400 has 1400% lower power consumption.

Instinct MI325X, on the other hand, has a 7100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 60% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between RTX A400 and Radeon Instinct MI325X. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX A400
RTX A400
AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X
Radeon Instinct MI325X

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 12 votes

Rate RTX A400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 18 votes

Rate Radeon Instinct MI325X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.