Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) vs RTX A400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
CMP 70HX CMP 90HX Quadro RTX A6000 A400 A500 A1000 A2000 A2000 12 GB A4000 A4500 A5000 A5500
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Arc 7-Core iGPU Arc 7-Cores iGPU Arc 8-Core iGPU 4-Core iGPU (Arc) 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX A400 with Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake), including specs and performance data.

RTX A400
2024
4 GB GDDR6, 50 Watt
13.52
+51.9%

RTX A400 outperforms Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) by an impressive 52% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
RTX A400 RTX A400
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking398496
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency21.89no data
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2025)Xe LPG (2023)
GPU code nameGA107Meteor Lake iGPU
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date16 April 2024 (1 year ago)14 December 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7684
Core clock speed727 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1762 MHz1950 MHz
Number of transistors8,700 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology8 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Wattno data
Texture fill rate42.29no data
Floating-point processing power2.706 TFLOPSno data
ROPs16no data
TMUs24no data
Tensor Cores24no data
Ray Tracing Cores6no data
L1 Cacheno data768 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8no data
Length163 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GBno data
Memory bus width64 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1500 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth96 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4ano data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)no data
Shader Model6.7no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan1.3-
CUDA8.6-
DLSS+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD30−35
+36.4%
22
−36.4%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry 5 24
+0%
24
+0%
Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Valorant 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry 5 22
+0%
22
+0%
Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 15
+0%
15
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30
+0%
30
+0%
Valorant 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry 5 21
+0%
21
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16
+0%
16
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Far Cry 5 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Valorant 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

This is how RTX A400 and Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) compete in popular games:

  • RTX A400 is 36% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 50 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 13.52 8.90
Recency 16 April 2024 14 December 2023
Chip lithography 8 nm 5 nm

RTX A400 has a 51.9% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 4 months.

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake), on the other hand, has a 60% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX A400 is our recommended choice as it beats the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) in performance tests.

Be aware that RTX A400 is a workstation graphics card while Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA RTX A400
RTX A400
Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RTX A400 RTX A400
vs
Quadro K5200 Quadro K5200
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) Graphics 4 Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)
vs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
RTX A400 RTX A400
vs
FirePro W7100 FirePro W7100
L20 L20
vs
RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile 500 Blackwell Mobile
RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB NVIDIA RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
vs
Quadro M2000 M2000
RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB NVIDIA RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
vs
Quadro 7000 7000
RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB NVIDIA RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
vs
P5000 Mobile P5000 Mobile
RTX A400 RTX A400
vs
Arc Graphics 2-core GPU (Arrow Lake) 2-core GPU (Arrow Lake)
Arc 8-Core iGPU Intel 8 Core iGPU
vs
GTX 750 v2 750 v2
Arc 8-Core iGPU Intel 8 Core iGPU
vs
GTX 760 X2 760 X2
Arc 8-Core iGPU Intel 8 Core iGPU
vs
GTX 960A 960A
Arc 8-Core iGPU Intel 8 Core iGPU
vs
Arc A350 A350
Arc 7-Core iGPU Intel 7 Core iGPU
vs
GTX 1050 Ti 1050 Ti

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.9 46 votes

Rate RTX A400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about RTX A400 or Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.