RTX A400 vs Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) with RTX A400, including specs and performance data.

Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
2023
9.46

RTX A400 outperforms Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) by an impressive 51% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking481384
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data21.68
ArchitectureXe LPG (2023)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameMeteor Lake iGPUGA107
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date14 December 2023 (1 year ago)16 April 2024 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4768
Core clock speedno data727 MHz
Boost clock speed1950 MHz1762 MHz
Number of transistorsno data8,700 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data50 Watt
Texture fill rateno data42.29
Floating-point processing powerno data2.706 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data24
Tensor Coresno data24
Ray Tracing Coresno data6

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data163 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data4 GB
Memory bus widthno data64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data96 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD25
−40%
35−40
+40%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 13
−38.5%
18−20
+38.5%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
−42.9%
60−65
+42.9%
Counter-Strike 2 11
−45.5%
16−18
+45.5%
Far Cry 5 30−35
−45.2%
45−50
+45.2%
Forza Horizon 4 50
−50%
75−80
+50%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
−37.9%
40−45
+37.9%
God of War 18−20
−42.1%
27−30
+42.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−42.9%
50−55
+42.9%
Valorant 90−95
−41.3%
130−140
+41.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
−42.9%
60−65
+42.9%
Counter-Strike 2 13
−38.5%
18−20
+38.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
−50%
30−33
+50%
Far Cry 5 24
−45.8%
35−40
+45.8%
Fortnite 55−60
−46.6%
85−90
+46.6%
Forza Horizon 4 39
−41%
55−60
+41%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
−37.9%
40−45
+37.9%
God of War 18−20
−42.1%
27−30
+42.1%
Grand Theft Auto V 15
−40%
21−24
+40%
Metro Exodus 18−20
−42.1%
27−30
+42.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−42.9%
50−55
+42.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−40%
35−40
+40%
Valorant 90−95
−41.3%
130−140
+41.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
−42.9%
60−65
+42.9%
Counter-Strike 2 50−55
−44.2%
75−80
+44.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
−50%
30−33
+50%
Far Cry 5 30−35
−45.2%
45−50
+45.2%
Fortnite 55−60
−46.6%
85−90
+46.6%
Forza Horizon 4 30
−50%
45−50
+50%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
−37.9%
40−45
+37.9%
God of War 18−20
−42.1%
27−30
+42.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−42.9%
50−55
+42.9%
Valorant 90−95
−41.3%
130−140
+41.3%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 70−75
−37%
100−105
+37%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
−38.5%
18−20
+38.5%
Metro Exodus 10−12
−45.5%
16−18
+45.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
−42.9%
70−75
+42.9%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
−45.8%
35−40
+45.8%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
−50%
27−30
+50%
Far Cry 5 20−22
−50%
30−33
+50%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−30.4%
30−33
+30.4%
Forza Horizon 5 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%
God of War 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−38.5%
18−20
+38.5%
Valorant 100−110
−41.5%
150−160
+41.5%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
−42.9%
30−33
+42.9%
Metro Exodus 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−50%
18−20
+50%
Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
Fortnite 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−50%
24−27
+50%
Forza Horizon 5 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
God of War 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
Valorant 50−55
−50%
75−80
+50%

This is how Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) and RTX A400 compete in popular games:

  • RTX A400 is 40% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.46 14.24
Recency 14 December 2023 16 April 2024
Chip lithography 5 nm 8 nm

Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) has a 60% more advanced lithography process.

RTX A400, on the other hand, has a 50.5% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 4 months.

The RTX A400 is our recommended choice as it beats the Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) in performance tests.

Be aware that Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is a notebook graphics card while RTX A400 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
NVIDIA RTX A400
RTX A400

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 14 votes

Rate Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 38 votes

Rate RTX A400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) or RTX A400, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.