RTX A2000 Mobile: specs and benchmarks

VS

Aggregated performance score

It provides good gaming and benchmark performance at 25.53% of a leader's which is GeForce RTX 4090.

RTX 4090GeForce RTX4090
Compare

Summary

NVIDIA started RTX A2000 Mobile sales 12 April 2021. This is a laptop graphics card based on an Ampere architecture and made with 8 nm manufacturing process. It is primarily aimed at gamers. 8 GB of GDDR6 memory clocked at 14 GHz are supplied, and together with 128 Bit memory interface this creates a bandwidth of 176.0 GB/s.

Compatibility-wise, this is card attached via PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. Power consumption is at 95 Watt (35 - 95 Watt TGP).

General info

Some basic facts about RTX A2000 Mobile: architecture, market segment, release date etc.

Place in performance ranking194
Place by popularitynot in top-100
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2022)
GPU code nameGA107
Market segmentLaptop
Release date12 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Technical specs

RTX A2000 Mobile's specs such as number of shaders, GPU base clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of RTX A2000 Mobile's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560of 20480 (Data Center GPU Max NEXT)
Core clock speed893 MHzof 2610 (Radeon RX 6500 XT)
Boost clock speed1687 MHzof 3599 (Radeon RX 7990 XTX)
Number of transistors13,250 millionof 14400 (GeForce GTX 1070 SLI Mobile)
Manufacturing process technology8 nmof 4 (Radeon 780M)
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt (35 - 95 Watt TGP)of 2400 (Data Center GPU Max Subsystem)
Texture fill rate108.6of 969.9 (H100 SXM5 96 GB)

Size and compatibility

Information on RTX A2000 Mobile's compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelarge
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16

Memory

Parameters of memory installed on RTX A2000 Mobile: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM instead.

Memory typeGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GBof 192 (Radeon Instinct MI300X)
Memory bus width128 Bitof 8192 (Radeon Instinct MI250X)
Memory clock speed14000 MHzof 23000 (GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER)
Memory bandwidth176.0 GB/sof 3276 (Aldebaran)
Shared memory-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on RTX A2000 Mobile. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference graphics cards, since for notebook ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model, while non-reference desktop models can (though not necessarily will) bear a different set of video ports.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs

API support

APIs supported by RTX A2000 Mobile, sometimes including their particular versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.6
OpenGL4.6
OpenCL3.0
Vulkan1.2
CUDA8.6

Benchmark performance

Synthetic benchmark performance of RTX A2000 Mobile. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX A2000 Mobile 25.53

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RTX A2000 Mobile 63738

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RTX A2000 Mobile 18058

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RTX A2000 Mobile 13157

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RTX A2000 Mobile 60336

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04

Benchmark coverage: 3%

RTX A2000 Mobile 96

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03

Benchmark coverage: 3%

RTX A2000 Mobile 142

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02

Benchmark coverage: 3%

RTX A2000 Mobile 110

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04

Benchmark coverage: 3%

RTX A2000 Mobile 135

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

RTX A2000 Mobile 116

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 medical-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

RTX A2000 Mobile 45

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

RTX A2000 Mobile 70

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

RTX A2000 Mobile 11

Gaming performance

Let's see how good RTX A2000 Mobile is for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in frames per second. Comparisons with game system requirements are included, but remember that sometimes official requirements may reflect reality inaccurately.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular modern games across different resolutions:

Full HD79
1440p41
4K38

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 74

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55
Battlefield 5 80−85
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70
Cyberpunk 2077 62
Far Cry 5 96
Far Cry New Dawn 72
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
Hitman 3 83
Horizon Zero Dawn 69
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 66
Watch Dogs: Legion 62

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 39
Battlefield 5 80−85
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70
Cyberpunk 2077 50
Far Cry 5 88
Far Cry New Dawn 71
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
Hitman 3 76
Horizon Zero Dawn 57
Metro Exodus 44
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 60
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 96
Watch Dogs: Legion 51

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 32
Battlefield 5 80−85
Cyberpunk 2077 41
Far Cry 5 83
Far Cry New Dawn 59
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50
Watch Dogs: Legion 29

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
Hitman 3 48
Horizon Zero Dawn 41
Metro Exodus 27
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27
Battlefield 5 55−60
Cyberpunk 2077 25
Far Cry 5 53
Far Cry New Dawn 49
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
Watch Dogs: Legion 20

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
Hitman 3 24−27
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
Metro Exodus 16−18
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 17
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 33

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
Battlefield 5 30−33
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
Far Cry 5 26
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
Watch Dogs: Legion 12−14

Relative performance

Overall RTX A2000 Mobile performance compared to nearest competitors among notebook video cards.


AMD equivalent

According to our data, the closest AMD alternative to RTX A2000 Mobile is Radeon RX 5600M, which is slower by 12% and lower by 34 positions in our ranking.

RX 5600MRadeon RX5600M
Compare

Here are some closest AMD rivals to RTX A2000 Mobile:

RTX A2000 Mobile 100

Similar GPUs

Here is our recommendation of several graphics cards that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.

RTX 2060 Max-QGeForce RTX2060 Max-Q
Compare
RTX 3050 6GB MobileGeForce RTX3050 6GB Mobile
Compare
RTX 3050 Ti MobileGeForce RTX3050 Ti Mobile
Compare
RTX 3050 4GB MobileGeForce RTX3050 4GB Mobile
Compare
GTX 1660 Ti MobileGeForce GTX1660 Ti Mobile
Compare

Recommended processors

These processors are most commonly used with RTX A2000 Mobile according to our statistics.

User Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics card, as well as rate it yourself.


3.8 86 votes

Rate RTX A2000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about RTX A2000 Mobile, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.