RTX A2000 Mobile vs Quadro

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro with RTX A2000 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Quadro
1999
32 MB SDR
2.26

RTX A2000 Mobile outperforms by a whopping 895% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking921288
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data18.44
ArchitectureCelsius (1999−2005)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameNV10GA107
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date1999 (27 years ago)12 April 2021 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data2560
Core clock speed135 MHz1215 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1687 MHz
Number of transistors17 million8,700 million
Manufacturing process technology220 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data95 Watt
Texture fill rate0.54135.0
Floating-point processing powerno data8.637 TFLOPS
ROPs448
TMUs480
Tensor Coresno data80
Ray Tracing Coresno data20
L1 Cacheno data2.5 MB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 4.0 x16
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount32 MB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed166 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth2.656 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGAPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGL1.24.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro 2.26
RTX A2000 Mobile 22.49
+895%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro 947
Samples: 3
RTX A2000 Mobile 9410
+894%
Samples: 2294

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD7−879
+1029%
1440p4−542
+950%
4K3−438
+1167%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart 60−65 60−65
Counter-Strike 2 120−130 120−130
Cyberpunk 2077 74 74
Resident Evil 4 Remake 50−55 50−55

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart 60−65 60−65
Battlefield 5 90−95 90−95
Counter-Strike 2 120−130 120−130
Cyberpunk 2077 62 62
Far Cry 5 96 96
Fortnite 110−120 110−120
Forza Horizon 4 90−95 90−95
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95 90−95
Valorant 160−170 160−170

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart 60−65 60−65
Battlefield 5 90−95 90−95
Counter-Strike 2 120−130 120−130
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 250−260 250−260
Cyberpunk 2077 50 50
Dota 2 145 145
Far Cry 5 88 88
Fortnite 110−120 110−120
Forza Horizon 4 90−95 90−95
Grand Theft Auto V 106 106
Metro Exodus 44 44
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95 90−95
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 96 96
Valorant 160−170 160−170

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 90−95 90−95
Cyberpunk 2077 41 41
Dota 2 129 129
Far Cry 5 83 83
Forza Horizon 4 90−95 90−95
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95 90−95
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50 50
Valorant 160−170 160−170

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 110−120 110−120

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 45−50 45−50
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170 160−170
Grand Theft Auto V 50 50
Metro Exodus 27 27
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
Valorant 180−190 180−190

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 65−70 65−70
Cyberpunk 2077 25 25
Far Cry 5 53 53
Forza Horizon 4 55−60 55−60
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40 35−40

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 55−60 55−60

4K
High

Atomic Heart 18−20 18−20
Counter-Strike 2 21−24 21−24
Grand Theft Auto V 44 44
Metro Exodus 18−20 18−20
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 33 33
Valorant 120−130 120−130

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 35−40 35−40
Counter-Strike 2 21−24 21−24
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11 10−11
Dota 2 72 72
Far Cry 5 26 26
Forza Horizon 4 40−45 40−45
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27 24−27

4K
Epic

Fortnite 24−27 24−27

This is how Quadro and RTX A2000 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX A2000 Mobile is 1029% faster in 1080p
  • RTX A2000 Mobile is 950% faster in 1440p
  • RTX A2000 Mobile is 1167% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 62 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.26 22.49
Maximum RAM amount 32 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 220 nm 8 nm

RTX A2000 Mobile has a 895% higher aggregate performance score, a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 96% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX A2000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro is a workstation graphics card while RTX A2000 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 11 votes

Rate Quadro on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 144 votes

Rate RTX A2000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro or RTX A2000 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.