Radeon RX 6650 XT vs RTX A2000 Embedded

RTX A1000 Embedded RTX A1000 Mobile RTX A1000 Mobile 6 GB RTX A2000 Embedded RTX A2000 Max-Q RTX A2000 Mobile RTX A3000 Mobile RTX A3000 Mobile 12 GB RTX A4000 Mobile RTX A4500 Mobile RTX A5000 Mobile RTX A5500 Mobile
VS
Radeon RX 5800 Radeon RX 5800 XT Radeon RX 6600 Radeon RX 6600 LE Radeon RX 6600 XT Radeon RX 6650 XT

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX A2000 Embedded with Radeon RX 6650 XT, including specs and performance data.

RTX A2000 Embedded
2022
4 GB GDDR6, 35 Watt
27.39

RX 6650 XT outperforms RTX A2000 Embedded by a considerable 40% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

RTX A2000 Embedded RTX A2000 Embedded
RX 6650 XT RX 6650 XT

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking19086
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data62.78
Power efficiency62.0117.30
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGA107SNavi 23
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date30 March 2022 (2 years ago)10 May 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25602048
Core clock speed607 MHz2055 MHz
Boost clock speed1177 MHz2635 MHz
Number of transistorsno data11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt176 Watt
Texture fill rate94.16337.3
Floating-point processing power6.026 TFLOPS10.79 TFLOPS
ROPs3264
TMUs80128
Tensor Cores80no data
Ray Tracing Cores2032

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x8
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz2190 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s280.3 GB/s
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.1
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.6-
DLSS+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RTX A2000 Embedded 27.39
RX 6650 XT 38.43
+40.3%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX A2000 Embedded 12238
RX 6650 XT 17174
+40.3%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD95−100
−45.3%
138
+45.3%
1440p45−50
−53.3%
69
+53.3%
4K24−27
−50%
36
+50%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.89
1440pno data5.78
4Kno data11.08

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 212
+0%
212
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 346
+0%
346
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 128
+0%
128
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 153
+0%
153
+0%
Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 342
+0%
342
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 108
+0%
108
+0%
Far Cry 5 173
+0%
173
+0%
Fortnite 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 198
+0%
198
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Valorant 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 89
+0%
89
+0%
Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 181
+0%
181
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 88
+0%
88
+0%
Dota 2 171
+0%
171
+0%
Far Cry 5 163
+0%
163
+0%
Fortnite 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 180
+0%
180
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 147
+0%
147
+0%
Metro Exodus 102
+0%
102
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 182
+0%
182
+0%
Valorant 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 78
+0%
78
+0%
Dota 2 136
+0%
136
+0%
Far Cry 5 151
+0%
151
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 107
+0%
107
+0%
Valorant 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 108
+0%
108
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 280−290
+0%
280−290
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 77
+0%
77
+0%
Metro Exodus 58
+0%
58
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 44
+0%
44
+0%
Far Cry 5 114
+0%
114
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 27
+0%
27
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 72
+0%
72
+0%
Metro Exodus 37
+0%
37
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 56
+0%
56
+0%
Valorant 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18
+0%
18
+0%
Dota 2 97
+0%
97
+0%
Far Cry 5 55
+0%
55
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

This is how RTX A2000 Embedded and RX 6650 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 6650 XT is 45% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6650 XT is 53% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6650 XT is 50% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 27.39 38.43
Recency 30 March 2022 10 May 2022
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 176 Watt

RTX A2000 Embedded has 402.9% lower power consumption.

RX 6650 XT, on the other hand, has a 40.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 month, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6650 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the RTX A2000 Embedded in performance tests.

Be aware that RTX A2000 Embedded is a mobile workstation card while Radeon RX 6650 XT is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded
RTX A2000 Embedded
AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT
Radeon RX 6650 XT
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RTX A2000 Embedded RTX A2000 Embedded
vs
Pro Vega 56 Radeon Pro Vega 56
RX 6650 XT Radeon RX 6650 XT
vs
RX 7600 XT Radeon RX 7600 XT
RTX A2000 Embedded RTX A2000 Embedded
vs
RTX 4000 Max-Q Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
RX 6750 XT AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT
vs
GTX 965M 4 GB GTX 965M 4 GB
RX 6850 XT AMD Radeon RX 6850 XT
vs
Arc A580 Arc A580
UHD Graphics 64EU Intel UHD Graphics 64EU
vs
RX 7700 XT RX 7700 XT
UHD Graphics 64EU Intel UHD Graphics 64EU
vs
RX 7800 XT RX 7800 XT
RTX 3050 8 GB GA107 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB GA107
vs
T1200 Max-Q T1200 Max-Q
RTX 4050 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050
vs
ROG Ally GPU Ally GPU
Arc A780 Intel Arc A780
vs
RX 7500 XT RX 7500 XT
RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
vs
R9 M395X R9 M395X
RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
vs
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 2.1 TFLOPS X Adreno X1-45 2.1 TFLOPS
Arc A580 Intel Arc A580
vs
PRO W7800 PRO W7800

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.7 3 votes

Rate RTX A2000 Embedded on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 3639 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6650 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about RTX A2000 Embedded or Radeon RX 6650 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.