GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB vs UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) with GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB, including specs and performance data.

UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)
2023
2.25

RTX 3050 4 GB outperforms UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) by a whopping 665% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking857317
Place by popularitynot in top-10031
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data37.07
Power efficiencyno data13.67
ArchitectureGen. 12 (2021−2023)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameAlder Lake XeGA107
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date3 January 2023 (2 years ago)27 January 2022 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores242048
Core clock speed450 MHz1545 MHz
Boost clock speed750 MHz1740 MHz
Number of transistorsno data8,700 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data90 Watt
Texture fill rateno data111.4
Floating-point processing powerno data7.127 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data64
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data242 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data4 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data192.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-8.6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD7
−614%
50−55
+614%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.98

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−650%
90−95
+650%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
−600%
35−40
+600%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−650%
90−95
+650%
Forza Horizon 4 10
−650%
75−80
+650%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%
Metro Exodus 7
−614%
50−55
+614%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−622%
65−70
+622%
Valorant 0−1 0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
−600%
35−40
+600%
Counter-Strike 2 4
−650%
30−33
+650%
Dota 2 5
−600%
35−40
+600%
Far Cry 5 12
−650%
90−95
+650%
Fortnite 12−14
−650%
90−95
+650%
Forza Horizon 4 10
−650%
75−80
+650%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%
Grand Theft Auto V 5
−600%
35−40
+600%
Metro Exodus 5
−600%
35−40
+600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−627%
160−170
+627%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−622%
65−70
+622%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−622%
65−70
+622%
Valorant 0−1 0−1
World of Tanks 40−45
−598%
300−310
+598%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
−600%
35−40
+600%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−650%
90−95
+650%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−633%
110−120
+633%
Forza Horizon 4 11
−627%
80−85
+627%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−627%
160−170
+627%
Valorant 0−1 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 0−1 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
−633%
110−120
+633%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%
World of Tanks 14−16
−633%
110−120
+633%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%
Counter-Strike 2 6−7
−650%
45−50
+650%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−650%
45−50
+650%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
−600%
14−16
+600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−600%
35−40
+600%
Valorant 8−9
−650%
60−65
+650%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18
−650%
120−130
+650%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−633%
110−120
+633%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−650%
45−50
+650%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−633%
110−120
+633%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
−600%
14−16
+600%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−600%
14−16
+600%
Fortnite 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%
Forza Horizon 5 0−1 0−1
Valorant 2−3
−600%
14−16
+600%

This is how UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) and RTX 3050 4 GB compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3050 4 GB is 614% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.25 17.21
Recency 3 January 2023 27 January 2022
Chip lithography 10 nm 8 nm

UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) has an age advantage of 11 months.

RTX 3050 4 GB, on the other hand, has a 664.9% higher aggregate performance score, and a 25% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB
GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 81 vote

Rate UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 2697 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.