RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile vs RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile
Aggregate performance score
We've compared RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile with RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile, including specs and performance data.
RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile by an impressive 59% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 31 | 110 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 19.40 | 23.90 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) | Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) |
| GPU code name | DG2-512 | no data |
| Market segment | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 12 October 2022 (2 years ago) | 21 March 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 4096 | 3072 |
| Core clock speed | 930 MHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 1680 MHz | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 115 Watt (35 - 115 Watt TGP) |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | large |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 20000 MHz | 16000 MHz |
| Shared memory | - | - |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 62.72 | 39.48 |
| Recency | 12 October 2022 | 21 March 2023 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 8 GB |
| Chip lithography | 6 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 115 Watt |
RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile has a 58.9% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 months, a 20% more advanced lithography process, and 95.7% lower power consumption.
The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile in performance tests.
Be aware that RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile is a notebook graphics card while RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
