Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh vs RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking32not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameDG2-512TU106
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date12 October 2022 (1 year ago)27 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40961920
Core clock speed930 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1680 MHz1380 MHz
Number of transistorsno data10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rateno data165.6
Floating-point processing powerno data5.299 gflops
ROPsno data64
TMUsno data120

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB6 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed20000 MHz14 GB/s
Memory bandwidthno data336.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.2
CUDA-7.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 October 2022 27 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 6 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 80 Watt

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile has an age advantage of 3 years, a 166.7% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh, on the other hand, has 181.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile and Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 7 votes

Rate RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.