ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4550 vs RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile with Mobility Radeon HD 4550, including specs and performance data.

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile
2023
16 GB GDDR6, 120 Watt
55.68
+15809%

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms Mobility HD 4550 by a whopping 15809% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking491352
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency35.73no data
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)Terascale 1 (2010)
GPU code nameAD103M92
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date21 March 2023 (3 years ago)1 January 2010 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores972880
Core clock speed1425 MHz550 MHz
Boost clock speed2115 MHzno data
Number of transistors45,900 million242 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Wattno data
Texture fill rate643.04.400
Floating-point processing power41.15 TFLOPS0.088 TFLOPS
ROPs1124
TMUs3048
Tensor Cores304no data
Ray Tracing Cores76no data
L1 Cache9.5 MBno data
L2 Cache64 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16MXM-II
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR3, DDR2, DDR3
Maximum RAM amount16 GB512 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed2250 MHz700 MHz
Memory bandwidth576.0 GB/s11.2 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model6.84.1
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL3.01.1
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA8.9-
DLSS+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD1550−1600
+15400%
10
−15400%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Valorant 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Valorant 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Valorant 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 0−1 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

This is how RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile and ATI Mobility HD 4550 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile is 15400% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 27 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 55.68 0.35
Recency 21 March 2023 1 January 2010
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 5 nm 55 nm

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile has a 15809% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1000% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 4550 in performance tests.

Be aware that RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation graphics card while Mobility Radeon HD 4550 is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 72 votes

Rate RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 37 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 4550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile or Mobility Radeon HD 4550, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.