RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4550

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Mobility Radeon HD 4550 with RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile, including specs and performance data.


ATI Mobility HD 4550
2010
512 MB GDDR3, DDR2, DDR3
0.35

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms Mobility HD 4550 by a whopping 14943% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking135266
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data36.86
ArchitectureTerascale 1 (2010)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameM92AD104
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date1 January 2010 (16 years ago)21 March 2023 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores807424
Core clock speed550 MHz1290 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1665 MHz
Number of transistors242 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data110 Watt
Texture fill rate4.400386.3
Floating-point processing power0.088 TFLOPS24.72 TFLOPS
ROPs480
TMUs8232
Tensor Coresno data232
Ray Tracing Coresno data58
L1 Cacheno data7.3 MB
L2 Cacheno data48 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceMXM-IIPCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3, DDR2, DDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB12 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth11.2 GB/s432.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.16.8
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD10
−14900%
1500−1550
+14900%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−14900%
150−160
+14900%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−14900%
150−160
+14900%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−14900%
600−650
+14900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−14900%
1050−1100
+14900%
Valorant 24−27
−14900%
3900−3950
+14900%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16
−14900%
2100−2150
+14900%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−14900%
150−160
+14900%
Dota 2 10−11
−14900%
1500−1550
+14900%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−14900%
600−650
+14900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−14900%
1050−1100
+14900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−14900%
750−800
+14900%
Valorant 24−27
−14900%
3900−3950
+14900%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−14900%
150−160
+14900%
Dota 2 10−11
−14900%
1500−1550
+14900%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−14900%
600−650
+14900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−14900%
1050−1100
+14900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−14900%
750−800
+14900%
Valorant 24−27
−14900%
3900−3950
+14900%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−14900%
450−500
+14900%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 1−2
−14900%
150−160
+14900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−14900%
600−650
+14900%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−14900%
150−160
+14900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−14900%
150−160
+14900%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 0−1 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−14900%
2100−2150
+14900%
Valorant 2−3
−14900%
300−310
+14900%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−14900%
150−160
+14900%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−14900%
300−310
+14900%

This is how ATI Mobility HD 4550 and RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is 14900% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.35 52.65
Recency 1 January 2010 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 12 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 5 nm

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile has a 14943% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1000% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 4550 in performance tests.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 4550 is a notebook graphics card while RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 37 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 4550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 45 votes

Rate RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon HD 4550 or RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.