RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4550

Place in the ranking	1303	37
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	no data	27.27
Architecture	Terascale 1 (2010)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	M92	no data
Market segment	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Release date	1 January 2010 (15 years ago)	21 March 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	80	7424
Core clock speed	550 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	242 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	150 Watt (60 - 150 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate	4.400	no data
Floating-point processing power	0.088 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	4	no data
TMUs	8	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	MXM-II	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3, DDR2, DDR3	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	12 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	700 MHz	16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	11.2 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	10.1 (10_1)	12 Ultimate
Shader Model	4.1	no data
OpenGL	3.3	no data
OpenCL	1.1	no data
Vulkan	N/A	-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−17400%

1750−1800
+17400%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

2−3

−17400%

350−400
+17400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −16567%	500−550 +16567%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −17400%	350−400 +17400%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −17400%	350−400 +17400%
Hitman 3	4−5 −17400%	700−750 +17400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −17400%	1400−1450 +17400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −17400%	700−750 +17400%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −17757%	5000−5050 +17757%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −16567%	500−550 +16567%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −17400%	350−400 +17400%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −17400%	350−400 +17400%
Hitman 3	4−5 −17400%	700−750 +17400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −17400%	1400−1450 +17400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −17400%	700−750 +17400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −17678%	1600−1650 +17678%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −17757%	5000−5050 +17757%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −16567%	500−550 +16567%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −17400%	350−400 +17400%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −17400%	350−400 +17400%
Hitman 3	4−5 −17400%	700−750 +17400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −17400%	1400−1450 +17400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −17400%	700−750 +17400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −17678%	1600−1650 +17678%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −17757%	5000−5050 +17757%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Hitman 3	6−7 −17400%	1050−1100 +17400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	2−3 −17400%	350−400 +17400%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−17400%

350−400
+17400%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −16900%	170−180 +16900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−17400%

350−400
+17400%

This is how ATI Mobility HD 4550 and RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile compete in popular games:

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is 17400% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.33	59.14
Recency	1 January 2010	21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	12 GB
Chip lithography	55 nm	5 nm

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile has a 17821.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1000% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 4550 in performance tests.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 4550 is a notebook graphics card while RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.