Arc A750 vs RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile with Arc A750, including specs and performance data.

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile
2022
16 GB GDDR6, 225 Watt
53.61
+22.3%

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms Arc A750 by a significant 22% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking4173
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data21.75
ArchitectureAda LovelaceGeneration 12.7 (2022)
GPU code nameDG2-512DG2-512
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date12 October 2022 (1 year ago)12 October 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$289
Current priceno data$625 (2.2x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40963584
Core clock speed930 MHz2050 MHz
Boost clock speed1680 MHz2400 MHz
Number of transistorsno data21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rateno data537.6

Form factor & compatibility

Information on RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile and Arc A750 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed20000 MHz16000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data512.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0
HDMIno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkanno data1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile 53.61
+22.3%
Arc A750 43.83

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms Arc A750 by 22% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile 51771
+38.8%
Arc A750 37288

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms Arc A750 by 39% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile 30422
+2.5%
Arc A750 29667

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms Arc A750 by 3% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD120−130
+17.6%
102
−17.6%
1440p70−75
+14.8%
61
−14.8%
4K45−50
+21.6%
37
−21.6%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 75−80
+21%
62
−21%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 110−120
+22.2%
90
−22.2%
Battlefield 5 170−180
+21.4%
140−150
−21.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−105
+13.6%
85−90
−13.6%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+19.6%
90−95
−19.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 130−140
+21.5%
100−110
−21.5%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+16.1%
112
−16.1%
Hitman 3 110−120
+22.2%
90−95
−22.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 230−240
+17.9%
195
−17.9%
Metro Exodus 170−180
+18.1%
144
−18.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
+17.6%
100−110
−17.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 300−310
+5.3%
285
−5.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
+14.6%
96
−14.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 65−70
+18.2%
55
−18.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 90−95
+18.4%
76
−18.4%
Battlefield 5 170−180
+21.4%
140−150
−21.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−105
+13.6%
85−90
−13.6%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+19.6%
90−95
−19.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 130−140
+21.5%
100−110
−21.5%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+18.8%
160−170
−18.8%
Hitman 3 110−120
+22.2%
90−95
−22.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 210−220
+17.3%
170−180
−17.3%
Metro Exodus 150−160
+18.1%
127
−18.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
+17.6%
100−110
−17.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 290−300
+21.3%
239
−21.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 220−230
+18.9%
185
−18.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
+15.4%
100−110
−15.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55−60
+22.2%
45
−22.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 80−85
+15.9%
69
−15.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−105
+13.6%
85−90
−13.6%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+19.6%
90−95
−19.6%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+22.2%
90
−22.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 130−140
+15%
113
−15%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 240−250
+20.6%
199
−20.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 80−85
+15.9%
69
−15.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 75−80
+19%
63
−19%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
+17.6%
100−110
−17.6%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 100−105
+16.3%
85−90
−16.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 150−160
+17.2%
128
−17.2%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
+18.4%
38
−18.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 65−70
+20.4%
54
−20.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 80−85
+17.6%
65−70
−17.6%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+18.4%
76
−18.4%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+20.3%
79
−20.3%
Hitman 3 70−75
+20.7%
55−60
−20.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
+19.6%
92
−19.6%
Metro Exodus 100−105
+16.3%
86
−16.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 170−180
+17.2%
145
−17.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+14%
57
−14%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+20%
50
−20%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 90−95
+18.4%
75−80
−18.4%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+22.2%
45−50
−22.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
+18.4%
35−40
−18.4%
Hitman 3 40−45
+11.1%
35−40
−11.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
+14%
55−60
−14%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
+13.6%
44
−13.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 80−85
+15.9%
69
−15.9%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−33
+7.1%
28
−7.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
+16.7%
30
−16.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+20.7%
27−30
−20.7%
Far Cry 5 30−33
+15.4%
24−27
−15.4%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+14.8%
61
−14.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 70−75
+20.7%
58
−20.7%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+15.4%
52
−15.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+16.7%
30
−16.7%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+12.5%
40−45
−12.5%

This is how RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile and Arc A750 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile is 18% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile is 15% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile is 22% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 53.61 43.83
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 8 GB

The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc A750 in performance tests.

Be aware that RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile is a notebook card while Arc A750 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile
Intel Arc A750
Arc A750

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 5 votes

Rate RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 694 votes

Rate Arc A750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.