GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile vs Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile with GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
2024
4 GB GDDR6, 35 Watt
24.40

RTX 5070 Mobile outperforms Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile by a whopping 106% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking24162
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency53.1176.61
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameAD107GB206
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date26 February 2024 (1 year ago)April 2025 (recently)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20484608
Core clock speed1485 MHz907 MHz
Boost clock speed2025 MHz1425 MHz
Number of transistors18,900 million21,900 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate129.6205.2
Floating-point processing power8.294 TFLOPS13.13 TFLOPS
ROPs3248
TMUs64144
Tensor Cores64144
Ray Tracing Cores1636

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedmedium sized
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 5.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth128.0 GB/s384.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.4
CUDA8.912.0
DLSS++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 24.40
RTX 5070 Mobile 50.28
+106%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 20239
RTX 5070 Mobile 44465
+120%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 14136
RTX 5070 Mobile 34440
+144%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD50−55
−118%
109
+118%
1440p30−35
−130%
69
+130%
4K14−16
−114%
30
+114%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2 222
+0%
222
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Fortnite 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 280−290
+0%
280−290
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 163
+0%
163
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Fortnite 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 144
+0%
144
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Valorant 280−290
+0%
280−290
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 105
+0%
105
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 115
+0%
115
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 350−400
+0%
350−400
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 109
+0%
109
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Valorant 290−300
+0%
290−300
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

This is how Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile and RTX 5070 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 5070 Mobile is 118% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 5070 Mobile is 130% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 5070 Mobile is 114% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 36 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 24.40 50.28
Recency 26 February 2024 on April 2025
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 50 Watt

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile has 42.9% lower power consumption.

RTX 5070 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 106.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

The GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile
GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 34 votes

Rate RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 36 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile or GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.