RTX A1000 vs RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile with RTX A1000, including specs and performance data.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
2023
12 GB GDDR6, 110 Watt
52.09
+104%

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms RTX A1000 by a whopping 104% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking67251
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency36.6739.49
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameAD104GA107
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date21 March 2023 (2 years ago)16 April 2024 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores74242304
Core clock speed1290 MHz727 MHz
Boost clock speed1665 MHz1462 MHz
Number of transistors35,800 million8,700 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)110 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate386.3105.3
Floating-point processing power24.72 TFLOPS6.737 TFLOPS
ROPs8032
TMUs23272
Tensor Cores23272
Ray Tracing Cores5818
L1 Cache7.3 MB2.3 MB
L2 Cache48 MB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data163 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount12 GB8 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2250 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth432.0 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.98.6
DLSS++

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile 52.09
+104%
RTX A1000 25.50

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile 22044
+104%
Samples: 353
RTX A1000 10792
Samples: 351

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 52.09 25.50
Recency 21 March 2023 16 April 2024
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 5 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 110 Watt 50 Watt

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile has a 104.3% higher aggregate performance score, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 60% more advanced lithography process.

RTX A1000, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 120% lower power consumption.

The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the RTX A1000 in performance tests.

Be aware that RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation graphics card while RTX A1000 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
NVIDIA RTX A1000
RTX A1000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 32 votes

Rate RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 54 votes

Rate RTX A1000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile or RTX A1000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.