UHD Graphics 630 Mobile vs Radeon RX 6750 XT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking46not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation51.82no data
Power efficiency14.81no data
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameNavi 22Coffee Lake GT2
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date3 March 2022 (2 years ago)3 April 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$549 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560192
Core clock speed2150 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed2600 MHz1000 MHz
Number of transistors17,200 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology7 nm14 nm+++
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate416.024.00
Floating-point processing power13.31 TFLOPS0.384 TFLOPS
ROPs643
TMUs16024
Ray Tracing Cores40no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16Ring Bus
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount12 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width192 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed2250 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth432.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4aPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.31.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 March 2022 3 April 2018
Chip lithography 7 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 15 Watt

RX 6750 XT has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

UHD Graphics 630 Mobile, on the other hand, has 1566.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 6750 XT and UHD Graphics 630 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX 6750 XT is a desktop card while UHD Graphics 630 Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT
Radeon RX 6750 XT
Intel UHD Graphics 630 Mobile
UHD Graphics 630 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 2584 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6750 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.4 15 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 630 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.