Iris Xe Graphics 80EU Mobile vs RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)Generation 12.2 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameAD107Raptor Lake GT1
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date21 March 2023 (1 year ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3072640
Core clock speed930 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1455 MHz1450 MHz
Number of transistors18,900 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology5 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate139.758.00
Floating-point processing power8.94 TFLOPS1.856 TFLOPS
ROPs4820
TMUs9640
Tensor Cores96no data
Ray Tracing Cores24no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16Ring Bus
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount8 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed2000 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth256.0 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.86.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.9-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 21 March 2023 4 January 2023
Chip lithography 5 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 15 Watt

RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation has an age advantage of 2 months, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

Iris Xe Graphics 80EU Mobile, on the other hand, has 133.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation and Iris Xe Graphics 80EU Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation is a mobile workstation card while Iris Xe Graphics 80EU Mobile is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation
RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation
Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU Mobile
Iris Xe Graphics 80EU Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 25 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics 80EU Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.