Quadro K5000 SYNC vs RSX Reality Synthesizer

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameRSX-CXD5302GK104
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date4 October 2012 (12 years ago)25 January 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$3,299

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data1536
Core clock speed550 MHz706 MHz
Number of transistors302 million3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt122 Watt
Texture fill rate13.2090.37
Floating-point processing powerno data2.169 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs24128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
WidthIGP3-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount256 MB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1400 MHz1350 MHz
Memory bandwidth22.4 GB/s172.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x SDI

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXN/A12 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLES 1.14.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.1.126
CUDA-3.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 October 2012 25 January 2013
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 122 Watt

RSX Reality Synthesizer has 52.5% lower power consumption.

K5000 SYNC, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 months, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between RSX Reality Synthesizer and Quadro K5000 SYNC. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that RSX Reality Synthesizer is a desktop card while Quadro K5000 SYNC is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RSX Reality Synthesizer
RSX Reality Synthesizer
NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC
Quadro K5000 SYNC

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 30 votes

Rate RSX Reality Synthesizer on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.1 25 votes

Rate Quadro K5000 SYNC on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.