Radeon RX Vega 11 vs Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS with Radeon RX Vega 11, including specs and performance data.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
40 Watt
10.35
+95.3%

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS outperforms RX Vega 11 by an impressive 95% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking433617
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency18.4910.82
Architectureno dataGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameno dataRaven
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release dateno data10 May 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1536704
Core clock speedno data300 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHz1251 MHz
Number of transistorsno data4,940 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rateno data55.04
Floating-point processing powerno data1.761 TFLOPS
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data44

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataIGP
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR5xSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus widthno dataSystem Shared
Memory clock speed8448 MHzSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataMotherboard Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.7 (6.4)
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.1
Vulkan-1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS 10.35
+95.3%
RX Vega 11 5.30

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS 7061
+28.8%
RX Vega 11 5483

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS 6982
+99.8%
RX Vega 11 3494

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS 1989
+113%
RX Vega 11 936

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD39
+44.4%
27
−44.4%
1440p9−10
+80%
5
−80%
4K21−24
+75%
12
−75%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 23
+64.3%
14−16
−64.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+106%
16−18
−106%
Counter-Strike 2 22
+57.1%
14−16
−57.1%
Forza Horizon 4 56
+180%
20
−180%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+145%
10−12
−145%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+61.1%
18
−61.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+75%
16−18
−75%
Valorant 40−45
+147%
16−18
−147%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+106%
16−18
−106%
Counter-Strike 2 19
+35.7%
14−16
−35.7%
Dota 2 36
+33.3%
27
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+43.3%
30
−43.3%
Fortnite 60−65
+93.8%
30−35
−93.8%
Forza Horizon 4 48
+182%
17
−182%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+145%
10−12
−145%
Grand Theft Auto V 36
+112%
17
−112%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+164%
11
−164%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
+51.9%
54
−51.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+75%
16−18
−75%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+77.8%
18−20
−77.8%
Valorant 40−45
+147%
16−18
−147%
World of Tanks 150−160
+72.7%
85−90
−72.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+106%
16−18
−106%
Counter-Strike 2 17
+21.4%
14−16
−21.4%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+65.4%
24−27
−65.4%
Forza Horizon 4 41
+173%
15
−173%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+145%
10−12
−145%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
+78.3%
45−50
−78.3%
Valorant 40−45
+147%
16−18
−147%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+114%
7−8
−114%
Dota 2 14−16
+180%
5−6
−180%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+150%
6−7
−150%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
World of Tanks 75−80
+97.4%
35−40
−97.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
+133%
9−10
−133%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+100%
12−14
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+178%
9−10
−178%
Forza Horizon 5 16−18
+100%
8−9
−100%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+320%
5−6
−320%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+75%
8−9
−75%
Valorant 27−30
+80%
14−16
−80%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Dota 2 21−24
+23.5%
16−18
−23.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+23.5%
16−18
−23.5%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+107%
15
−107%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+23.5%
16−18
−23.5%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
+100%
5−6
−100%
Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+117%
6−7
−117%
Fortnite 10−12
+120%
5−6
−120%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+180%
5−6
−180%
Forza Horizon 5 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Valorant 10−12
+120%
5−6
−120%

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Dota 2 42
+0%
42
+0%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 17
+0%
17
+0%

This is how Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS and RX Vega 11 compete in popular games:

  • Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS is 44% faster in 1080p
  • Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS is 80% faster in 1440p
  • Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS is 75% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS is 320% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS is ahead in 51 test (84%)
  • there's a draw in 10 tests (16%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.35 5.30
Chip lithography 4 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 35 Watt

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS has a 95.3% higher aggregate performance score, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

RX Vega 11, on the other hand, has 14.3% lower power consumption.

The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega 11 in performance tests.

Be aware that Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS is a notebook card while Radeon RX Vega 11 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11
Radeon RX Vega 11

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 14 votes

Rate Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 1823 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 11 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.