Quadro M600M vs Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS

Place in the ranking	426	607
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	18.69	12.99
Architecture	no data	Maxwell (2014−2017)
GPU code name	no data	GM107
Market segment	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Release date	no data	18 August 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1536	384
Core clock speed	no data	837 MHz
Boost clock speed	1500 MHz	876 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology	4 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	40 Watt	30 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	14.02
Floating-point processing power	no data	0.6728 TFLOPS
ROPs	no data	8
TMUs	no data	16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	no data	MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	LPDDR5x	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	no data	2 GB
Memory bus width	no data	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	8448 MHz	1253 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	80 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	no data	No outputs
Display Port	no data	1.2

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus	-	+
3D Vision Pro	no data	+
Mosaic	no data	+
nView Display Management	no data	+
Optimus	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12_1	12
Shader Model	no data	5.1
OpenGL	no data	4.5
OpenCL	no data	1.2
Vulkan	-	+
CUDA	-	5.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS 10.84
+91.9%

Quadro M600M 5.65

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS 7061
+143%

Quadro M600M 2911

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS 24058
+88.9%

Quadro M600M 12734

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS 6982
+187%

Quadro M600M 2430

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS 1989
+215%

Quadro M600M 631

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

39
+105%

−105%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2

23
+91.7%

12−14

−91.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 +106%	16−18 −106%
Counter-Strike 2	22 +83.3%	12−14 −83.3%
Forza Horizon 4	56 +143%	21−24 −143%
Forza Horizon 5	27−30 +133%	12−14 −133%
Metro Exodus	30−33 +114%	14−16 −114%
Red Dead Redemption 2	27−30 +64.7%	16−18 −64.7%
Valorant	40−45 +133%	18−20 −133%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 +106%	16−18 −106%
Counter-Strike 2	19 +58.3%	12−14 −58.3%
Dota 2	36 +89.5%	18−20 −89.5%
Far Cry 5	40−45 +63%	27−30 −63%
Fortnite	60−65 +90.9%	30−35 −90.9%
Forza Horizon 4	48 +109%	21−24 −109%
Forza Horizon 5	27−30 +133%	12−14 −133%
Grand Theft Auto V	36 +89.5%	18−20 −89.5%
Metro Exodus	30−33 +114%	14−16 −114%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	80−85 +76.6%	45−50 −76.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2	27−30 +64.7%	16−18 −64.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−35 +83.3%	18−20 −83.3%
Valorant	40−45 +133%	18−20 −133%
World of Tanks	150−160 +68.1%	90−95 −68.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 +106%	16−18 −106%
Counter-Strike 2	17 +41.7%	12−14 −41.7%
Far Cry 5	40−45 +63%	27−30 −63%
Forza Horizon 4	41 +78.3%	21−24 −78.3%
Forza Horizon 5	27−30 +133%	12−14 −133%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	80−85 +76.6%	45−50 −76.6%
Valorant	40−45 +133%	18−20 −133%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	14−16 +133%	6−7 −133%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 +150%	6−7 −150%
Red Dead Redemption 2	9−10 +125%	4−5 −125%
World of Tanks	75−80 +90.2%	40−45 −90.2%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 +133%	9−10 −133%
Counter-Strike 2	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Far Cry 5	24−27 +100%	12−14 −100%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 +150%	10−11 −150%
Forza Horizon 5	16−18 +113%	8−9 −113%
Metro Exodus	21−24 +250%	6−7 −250%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 +75%	8−9 −75%
Valorant	27−30 +80%	14−16 −80%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Dota 2	21−24 +23.5%	16−18 −23.5%
Grand Theft Auto V	21−24 +23.5%	16−18 −23.5%
Metro Exodus	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	30−35 +100%	16−18 −100%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 +133%	3−4 −133%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 +23.5%	16−18 −23.5%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	10−11 +100%	5−6 −100%
Counter-Strike 2	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Far Cry 5	12−14 +117%	6−7 −117%
Fortnite	12−14 +140%	5−6 −140%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 +180%	5−6 −180%
Forza Horizon 5	8−9 +167%	3−4 −167%
Valorant	10−12 +120%	5−6 −120%