T400 vs Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS with T400, including specs and performance data.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
2023
30 Watt
10.44
+27.9%

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS outperforms T400 by a significant 28% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking459530
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency28.0921.96
Architectureno dataTuring (2018−2022)
GPU code nameno dataTU117
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date26 October 2023 (2 years ago)6 May 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1536384
Core clock speedno data420 MHz
Boost clock speed1250 MHz1425 MHz
Number of transistorsno data4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt30 Watt
Texture fill rateno data34.20
Floating-point processing powerno data1.094 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data24
L1 Cacheno data384 KB
L2 Cacheno data1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR5xGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data2 GB
Memory bus widthno data64 Bit
Memory clock speed8448 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data80 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data3x mini-DisplayPort

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.2
CUDA-7.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD32
+33.3%
24−27
−33.3%
1440p14
+40%
10−12
−40%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+35.6%
45−50
−35.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+43.8%
16−18
−43.8%
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22
+42.9%
14−16
−42.9%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 45−50
+40%
35−40
−40%
Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+35.6%
45−50
−35.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+43.8%
16−18
−43.8%
Far Cry 5 30
+42.9%
21−24
−42.9%
Fortnite 65−70
+32%
50−55
−32%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+37.1%
35−40
−37.1%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+41.7%
24−27
−41.7%
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22
+42.9%
14−16
−42.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+33.3%
30−33
−33.3%
Valorant 100−110
+36%
75−80
−36%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 45−50
+40%
35−40
−40%
Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+35.6%
45−50
−35.6%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170
+35.8%
120−130
−35.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+43.8%
16−18
−43.8%
Far Cry 5 28
+33.3%
21−24
−33.3%
Fortnite 65−70
+32%
50−55
−32%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+37.1%
35−40
−37.1%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+41.7%
24−27
−41.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 35
+29.6%
27−30
−29.6%
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22
+42.9%
14−16
−42.9%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+43.8%
16−18
−43.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+33.3%
30−33
−33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40
+33.3%
30−33
−33.3%
Valorant 100−110
+36%
75−80
−36%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 45−50
+40%
35−40
−40%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+43.8%
16−18
−43.8%
Far Cry 5 26
+44.4%
18−20
−44.4%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+37.1%
35−40
−37.1%
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22
+42.9%
14−16
−42.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+33.3%
30−33
−33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 19
+35.7%
14−16
−35.7%
Valorant 100−110
+36%
75−80
−36%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 65−70
+32%
50−55
−32%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+31.3%
16−18
−31.3%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 85−90
+30.8%
65−70
−30.8%
Grand Theft Auto V 15
+50%
10−11
−50%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
+28.3%
60−65
−28.3%
Valorant 120−130
+34.4%
90−95
−34.4%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 27−30
+38.1%
21−24
−38.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+33.3%
18−20
−33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+28.6%
21−24
−28.6%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 24−27
+33.3%
18−20
−33.3%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+43.8%
16−18
−43.8%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Metro Exodus 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Valorant 60−65
+33.3%
45−50
−33.3%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+35.7%
14−16
−35.7%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%

This is how Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS and T400 compete in popular games:

  • Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS is 33% faster in 1080p
  • Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS is 40% faster in 1440p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.44 8.16
Recency 26 October 2023 6 May 2021
Chip lithography 4 nm 12 nm

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS has a 27.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 200% more advanced lithography process.

The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS is our recommended choice as it beats the T400 in performance tests.

Be aware that Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS is a notebook graphics card while T400 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
NVIDIA T400
T400

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 11 votes

Rate Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 410 votes

Rate T400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS or T400, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.