ATI Radeon X800 GTO vs Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS

Place in the ranking	427	1331
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	25.08	0.43
Architecture	no data	R400 (2004−2008)
GPU code name	no data	R423
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	no data (2024 years ago)	29 December 2007 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1536	no data
Core clock speed	no data	400 MHz
Boost clock speed	1250 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	no data	160 million
Manufacturing process technology	4 nm	130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	30 Watt	49 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	4.800
ROPs	no data	12
TMUs	no data	12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	no data	PCIe 1.0 x16
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	LPDDR5x	DDR
Maximum RAM amount	no data	128 MB
Memory bus width	no data	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	8448 MHz	350 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	22.4 GB/s
Shared memory	+	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

no data

1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12_1	9.0b (9_2)
OpenGL	no data	2.0
OpenCL	no data	N/A
Vulkan	-	N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	34	0−1
1440p	17	-0−1

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	10.81	0.30
Chip lithography	4 nm	130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	30 Watt	49 Watt

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS has a 3503.3% higher aggregate performance score, a 3150% more advanced lithography process, and 63.3% lower power consumption.

The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon X800 GTO in performance tests.

Be aware that Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS is a notebook card while Radeon X800 GTO is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.