HD Graphics 2000 vs Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 2.1 TFLOPS Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
VS
HD Graphics 2000 HD Graphics 3000 HD Graphics 4000 HD Graphics 4200 HD Graphics 4400 HD Graphics 4600 HD Graphics 5000 HD Graphics 5300 HD Graphics 5500 HD Graphics 5600 HD Graphics 6000

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS and HD Graphics 2000, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
30 Watt
10.30
+1807%

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS outperforms HD Graphics 2000 by a whopping 1807% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
HD Graphics 2000 HD Graphics 2000

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking4391227
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency24.44no data
Architectureno dataGeneration 6.0 (2011)
GPU code nameno dataSandy Bridge GT1
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release dateno data1 February 2011 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores153648
Core clock speedno data850 MHz
Boost clock speed1250 MHz1350 MHz
Number of transistorsno data189 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Wattunknown
Texture fill rateno data8.100
Floating-point processing powerno data0.1296 TFLOPS
ROPsno data1
TMUsno data6

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 1.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR5xSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus widthno dataSystem Shared
Memory clock speed8448 MHzSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_111.1 (10_1)
Shader Modelno data4.1
OpenGLno data3.1
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD35
+218%
11
−218%
1440p180−1

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 23
+283%
6−7
−283%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+3400%
1−2
−3400%
Counter-Strike 2 19
+217%
6−7
−217%
Forza Horizon 4 50
+1150%
4−5
−1150%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+2600%
1−2
−2600%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+2800%
1−2
−2800%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+460%
5−6
−460%
Valorant 40−45
+1950%
2−3
−1950%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+3400%
1−2
−3400%
Counter-Strike 2 16
+167%
6−7
−167%
Dota 2 35
+3400%
1−2
−3400%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+425%
8−9
−425%
Fortnite 60−65 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 42
+950%
4−5
−950%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+2600%
1−2
−2600%
Grand Theft Auto V 35
+3400%
1−2
−3400%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+2800%
1−2
−2800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
+913%
8−9
−913%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+460%
5−6
−460%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+540%
5−6
−540%
Valorant 40−45
+1950%
2−3
−1950%
World of Tanks 150−160
+844%
16−18
−844%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+3400%
1−2
−3400%
Counter-Strike 2 14
+133%
6−7
−133%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+425%
8−9
−425%
Forza Horizon 4 36
+800%
4−5
−800%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+2600%
1−2
−2600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
+913%
8−9
−913%
Valorant 40−45
+1950%
2−3
−1950%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8−9 0−1
Dota 2 15 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 15 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10 0−1
World of Tanks 75−80
+7500%
1−2
−7500%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
+2000%
1−2
−2000%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+475%
4−5
−475%
Forza Horizon 4 28
+2700%
1−2
−2700%
Forza Horizon 5 16−18 0−1
Metro Exodus 21−24
+2000%
1−2
−2000%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+250%
4−5
−250%
Valorant 24−27
+420%
5−6
−420%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 3−4 0−1
Dota 2 21−24
+40%
14−16
−40%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+40%
14−16
−40%
Metro Exodus 6−7 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+3000%
1−2
−3000%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+40%
14−16
−40%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 3−4 0−1
Far Cry 5 12−14 0−1
Fortnite 10−12 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 14−16 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 8−9 0−1
Valorant 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

This is how Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS and HD Graphics 2000 compete in popular games:

  • Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS is 218% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in World of Tanks, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS is 7500% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS is ahead in 24 tests (75%)
  • there's a draw in 8 tests (25%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 10.30 0.54
Chip lithography 4 nm 32 nm

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS has a 1807.4% higher aggregate performance score, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 2000 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
Intel HD Graphics 2000
HD Graphics 2000
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
vs
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
HD Graphics 2000 HD Graphics 2000
vs
GT 240M GeForce GT 240M
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
vs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 Iris Xe Graphics G7
Arc 8-Core iGPU Arc 8 Core iGPU
vs
P5000 X2 Mobile P5000 X2 Mobile
Arc Graphics 140V Arc Graphics 140V
vs
GT 650M GT 650M
Arc Graphics 140V Arc Graphics 140V
vs
GTX 560 GTX 560
Arc Graphics 140V Arc Graphics 140V
vs
Arc Pro A60M Pro A60M
Arc Graphics 130V Arc Graphics 130V
vs
RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh 4 GB RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh 4 GB
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
vs
ATI X800 GTO X800 GTO
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
vs
7600 GT GeForce 7600 GT
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
vs
Iris Xe Graphics G4 Xe Graphics G4
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS
vs
Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU Pro 14-Core GPU
GTX 1080 SLI Mobile GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile
vs
HD Graphics (Haswell) HD Graphics (Haswell)

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.9 11 votes

Rate Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 1363 votes

Rate HD Graphics 2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS or HD Graphics 2000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.