Quadro M2000 vs Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS with Quadro M2000, including specs and performance data.
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS outperforms M2000 by a small 7% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 422 | 438 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 3.46 |
| Power efficiency | 25.53 | 9.54 |
| Architecture | no data | Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) |
| GPU code name | no data | GM206 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | no data (2024 years ago) | 8 April 2016 (8 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $437.75 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1536 | 768 |
| Core clock speed | no data | 796 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1250 MHz | 1163 MHz |
| Number of transistors | no data | 2,940 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 55.82 |
| Floating-point processing power | no data | 1.786 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | no data | 32 |
| TMUs | no data | 48 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | no data | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 201 mm |
| Width | no data | 1" (2.5 cm) |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | LPDDR5x | 128 Bit |
| Maximum RAM amount | no data | 4 GB |
| Memory bus width | no data | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 8448 MHz | 1653 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | Up to 106 GB/s |
| Shared memory | + | no data |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | 4x DisplayPort |
| Number of simultaneous displays | no data | 4 |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| 3D Vision Pro | no data | + |
| Mosaic | no data | + |
| nView Desktop Management | no data | + |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12 |
| Shader Model | no data | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | no data | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | - | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | - | 5.2 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 36
+20%
| 30−35
−20%
|
| 1440p | 19
+18.8%
| 16−18
−18.8%
|
Cost per frame, $
| 1080p | no data | 14.59 |
| 1440p | no data | 27.36 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 11.08 | 10.35 |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 75 Watt |
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS has a 7.1% higher aggregate performance score, a 600% more advanced lithography process, and 150% lower power consumption.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS and Quadro M2000.
Be aware that Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS is a notebook card while Quadro M2000 is a workstation one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
