GeForce Go 7700 vs Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS and GeForce Go 7700, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
2023
30 Watt
11.02
+3049%

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS outperforms Go 7700 by a whopping 3049% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking4611343
Place by popularity19not in top-100
Power efficiency28.21no data
Architectureno dataCurie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameno dataG73
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date26 October 2023 (2 years ago)1 August 2006 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores153617
Core clock speedno data450 MHz
Boost clock speed1250 MHz450 MHz
Number of transistorsno data177 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Wattno data
Texture fill rateno data5.400
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Interfaceno dataPCIe 1.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR5xGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountno data512 MB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speed8448 MHz500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data16 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_19.0c (9_3)
Shader Modelno data3.0
OpenGLno data2.1
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD310−1
1440p14-0−1

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+6000%
1−2
−6000%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+2200%
1−2
−2200%
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22
+300%
5−6
−300%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 45−50
+4800%
1−2
−4800%
Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+6000%
1−2
−6000%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+2200%
1−2
−2200%
Far Cry 5 30 0−1
Fortnite 65−70
+3200%
2−3
−3200%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+1100%
4−5
−1100%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+3300%
1−2
−3300%
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22
+300%
5−6
−300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+471%
7−8
−471%
Valorant 100−110
+292%
24−27
−292%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 45−50
+4800%
1−2
−4800%
Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+6000%
1−2
−6000%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170
+1064%
14−16
−1064%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+2200%
1−2
−2200%
Far Cry 5 28 0−1
Fortnite 65−70
+3200%
2−3
−3200%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+1100%
4−5
−1100%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+3300%
1−2
−3300%
Grand Theft Auto V 35
+3400%
1−2
−3400%
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22
+300%
5−6
−300%
Metro Exodus 21−24 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+471%
7−8
−471%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40
+700%
5−6
−700%
Valorant 100−110
+292%
24−27
−292%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 45−50
+4800%
1−2
−4800%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+2200%
1−2
−2200%
Far Cry 5 26 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+1100%
4−5
−1100%
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22
+300%
5−6
−300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+471%
7−8
−471%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 19
+280%
5−6
−280%
Valorant 100−110
+292%
24−27
−292%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 65−70
+3200%
2−3
−3200%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+600%
3−4
−600%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 80−85
+8300%
1−2
−8300%
Grand Theft Auto V 15 0−1
Metro Exodus 12−14 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+1625%
4−5
−1625%
Valorant 120−130
+3933%
3−4
−3933%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 27−30 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10 0−1
Far Cry 5 24−27 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+2600%
1−2
−2600%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+1500%
1−2
−1500%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 24−27 0−1

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 6−7 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+57.1%
14−16
−57.1%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7 0−1
Metro Exodus 7−8 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16 0−1
Valorant 55−60
+2850%
2−3
−2850%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 14−16 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 6−7 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1
Far Cry 5 10−12 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 18−20 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%

Full HD
High

Dota 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Dota 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS is 8300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS performs better in 29 tests (94%)
  • there's a draw in 2 tests (6%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.02 0.35
Recency 26 October 2023 1 August 2006
Chip lithography 4 nm 90 nm

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS has a 3048.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 17 years, and a 2150% more advanced lithography process.

The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce Go 7700 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
NVIDIA GeForce Go 7700
GeForce Go 7700

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 12 votes

Rate Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 29 votes

Rate GeForce Go 7700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS or GeForce Go 7700, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.