GeForce GTX 760 OEM vs Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking458not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency28.28no data
Architectureno dataKepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameno dataGK104
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date26 October 2023 (2 years ago)6 November 2016 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores15361344
Core clock speedno data993 MHz
Boost clock speed1250 MHz1046 MHz
Number of transistorsno data3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt170 Watt
Texture fill rateno data117.2
Floating-point processing powerno data2.812 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data112
L1 Cacheno data112 KB
L2 Cacheno data512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data241 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR5xGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data2 GB
Memory bus widthno data256 Bit
Memory clock speed8448 MHz1650 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data211.2 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.1
CUDA-3.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 26 October 2023 6 November 2016
Chip lithography 4 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 170 Watt

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS has an age advantage of 6 years, a 600% more advanced lithography process, and 466.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS and GeForce GTX 760 OEM. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS is a notebook graphics card while GeForce GTX 760 OEM is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM
GeForce GTX 760 OEM

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 11 votes

Rate Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 48 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 760 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS or GeForce GTX 760 OEM, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.