B200 SXM 192 GB vs Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking481not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency19.29no data
Architectureno dataBlackwell (2024−2025)
GPU code nameno dataGB100
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date26 October 2023 (2 years ago)2024 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores153616896 ×2
Core clock speedno data1665 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHz1837 MHz
Number of transistorsno data104,000 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt1000 Watt
Texture fill rateno data969.9 ×2
Floating-point processing powerno data62.08 TFLOPS ×2
ROPsno data24 ×2
TMUsno data528 ×2
Tensor Coresno data528 ×2
L1 Cacheno data33 MB
L2 Cacheno data50 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 5.0 x16
Widthno dataSXM Module

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR5xHBM3e
Maximum RAM amountno data96 GB ×2
Memory bus widthno data4096 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed8448 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data4.1 TB/s ×2
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_1N/A
Shader Modelno dataN/A
OpenGLno dataN/A
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA-10.0
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 4 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 1000 Watt

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS has a 25% more advanced lithography process, and 2400% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS and B200 SXM 192 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS is a notebook graphics card while B200 SXM 192 GB is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB
B200 SXM 192 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 17 votes

Rate Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 67 votes

Rate B200 SXM 192 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS or B200 SXM 192 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.