Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB vs Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS with Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB, including specs and performance data.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS
2024
20 Watt
6.25

RX 9060 XT 16 GB outperforms Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS by a whopping 669% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking60274
Place by popularitynot in top-10070
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data81.76
Power efficiency23.8122.89
Architectureno dataRDNA 4.0 (2025)
GPU code nameno dataNavi 44
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date3 September 2024 (less than a year ago)4 June 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$349

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7682048
Core clock speedno data1700 MHz
Boost clock speedno data3130 MHz
Number of transistorsno data29,700 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt160 Watt
Texture fill rateno data400.6
Floating-point processing powerno data25.64 TFLOPS
ROPsno data64
TMUsno data128
Ray Tracing Coresno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR5xGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed8448 MHz2518 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data322.3 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI 2.1b, 2x DisplayPort 2.1a
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.2
Vulkan-1.3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD20
−650%
150−160
+650%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.33

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
−642%
230−240
+642%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−669%
100−105
+669%
God of War 12−14
−669%
100−105
+669%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
−641%
200−210
+641%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
−642%
230−240
+642%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−669%
100−105
+669%
Far Cry 5 21
−662%
160−170
+662%
Fortnite 35−40
−669%
300−310
+669%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−659%
220−230
+659%
Forza Horizon 5 18−20
−622%
130−140
+622%
God of War 12−14
−669%
100−105
+669%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−639%
170−180
+639%
Valorant 70−75
−604%
500−550
+604%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
−641%
200−210
+641%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
−642%
230−240
+642%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 100−110
−669%
800−850
+669%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−669%
100−105
+669%
Far Cry 5 19
−637%
140−150
+637%
Fortnite 35−40
−669%
300−310
+669%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−659%
220−230
+659%
Forza Horizon 5 18−20
−622%
130−140
+622%
God of War 12−14
−669%
100−105
+669%
Grand Theft Auto V 24
−650%
180−190
+650%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−650%
90−95
+650%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−639%
170−180
+639%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 22
−627%
160−170
+627%
Valorant 70−75
−604%
500−550
+604%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
−641%
200−210
+641%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−669%
100−105
+669%
Far Cry 5 18
−622%
130−140
+622%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−659%
220−230
+659%
God of War 12−14
−669%
100−105
+669%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−639%
170−180
+639%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 11
−627%
80−85
+627%
Valorant 70−75
−604%
500−550
+604%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 35−40
−669%
300−310
+669%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−650%
90−95
+650%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 45−50
−614%
350−400
+614%
Grand Theft Auto V 8−9
−650%
60−65
+650%
Metro Exodus 6−7
−650%
45−50
+650%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−669%
300−310
+669%
Valorant 70−75
−604%
500−550
+604%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 10−12
−627%
80−85
+627%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−600%
35−40
+600%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−650%
90−95
+650%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−633%
110−120
+633%
God of War 6−7
−650%
45−50
+650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−650%
60−65
+650%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 12−14
−669%
100−105
+669%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
−622%
130−140
+622%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−650%
30−33
+650%
Valorant 30−35
−650%
240−250
+650%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
−600%
35−40
+600%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−650%
45−50
+650%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−650%
75−80
+650%
God of War 5−6
−600%
35−40
+600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−650%
45−50
+650%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 6−7
−650%
45−50
+650%

This is how Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS and RX 9060 XT 16 GB compete in popular games:

  • RX 9060 XT 16 GB is 650% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.25 48.08
Recency 3 September 2024 4 June 2025
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 160 Watt

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS has 700% lower power consumption.

RX 9060 XT 16 GB, on the other hand, has a 669.3% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 9 months.

The Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS in performance tests.

Be aware that Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS
SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS
AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB
Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 3 votes

Rate Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 369 votes

Rate Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS or Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.