Radeon R7 360E vs Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking635not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency23.49no data
Architectureno dataGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameno dataTobago
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date3 September 2024 (1 year ago)30 December 2015 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768768
Core clock speedno data1050 MHz
Number of transistorsno data2,080 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rateno data50.40
Floating-point processing powerno data1.613 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data48
L1 Cacheno data192 KB
L2 Cacheno data256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR5xGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed8448 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data96 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.3
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 September 2024 30 December 2015
Chip lithography 4 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 75 Watt

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS has an age advantage of 8 years, a 600% more advanced lithography process, and 275% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS and Radeon R7 360E. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS is a notebook graphics card while Radeon R7 360E is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 6 votes

Rate Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 5 votes

Rate Radeon R7 360E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS or Radeon R7 360E, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.